English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/177141
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Seabird plastic ingestion differs among collection methods: Examples from the short-tailed shearwater

AuthorsRodríguez, Airam ; Ramírez, Francisco ; Carrasco, M. Nazaret; Chiaradoa, André
KeywordsArtificial light
Light-induced mortality
Marine debrisMicroplastics
Monitoring program
Plastic ingestion
Issue Date2018
CitationEnvironmental Pollution, 243 Part B: 1750-1757 (2018)
AbstractDespite the increase of literature on seabird plastic ingestion in recent years, few studies have assessed how plastic loads vary according to different sampling methods. Most studies use necropsies of seabirds with a natural cause of death, e.g. beached or predated, to determine plastic loads and monitor marine debris. Sampling naturally dead seabirds may be biased as they have perished because of their intrinsic factors, e.g. poor body condition, high parasite loads, sickness or predation, affecting estimates of plastic loads. However, seabirds killed accidentally may be more representative of the population. Here, we used the short-tailed shearwater Ardenna tenuirostris to test different sampling methods: naturally beached fledglings and accidentally road-killed fledglings after being attracted and grounded by artificial lights. We compared plastic load, body condition, and feeding strategies (through using feathers’ δ13C and δ15N isotope niche) between beached and road-killed fledglings. Beached birds showed higher plastic loads, poorer body condition and reduced isotopic variability, suggesting that this group is not a representative subsample of the whole cohort of the fledgling population. Our results might have implications for long-term monitoring programs of seabird plastic ingestion. Monitoring plastic debris through beached birds could overestimate plastic ingestion by the entire population. We encourage the establishment of refined monitoring programs using fledglings grounded by light pollution if available. These samples focus on known cohorts from the same population. The fledgling plastic loads are transferred from parents during parental feeding, accumulating during the chick-rearing period. Thus, these fledglings provide a higher and valuable temporal resolution, which is more useful and informative than unknown life history of beached birds.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.007
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ENVPOL_2018_2549_R3_DigitalCSIC.docx810,07 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.