English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/17664
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case

AuthorsGarcía Aracil, Adela ; Gutiérrez Gracia, Antonio ; Pérez Marín, Marián
Issue Date26-May-2006
PublisherAkadémiai Kiadó (Budapest)
Springer
CitationScientometrics 67(2): 213-230 (2006)
AbstractIn this paper we analyze the objectivity of the peer review process of research performance by research groups in the scientific and technological Valencian system, over the period 1998–2002. For that purpose, we use qualitative and quantitative indicators to assess which of them are the most important to determine a research group as excellent one, based on peer review evaluation methodology. The results show that excellence appears to be driven only by publications in SCI/SSCI and the number of sexenios, and suggest that the peer review process is not as objective as we expected.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/17664
DOI10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z
ISSN0138-9130
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
scientometrics 67_2_p 213.pdf83,36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.