Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/175117
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorFerreras, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, José-
dc.contributor.authorTobajas, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorDescalzo, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorMateo, Rafael-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-01T14:01:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-01T14:01:17Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citation12th International Mammalogical Congress (2017)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/175117-
dc.descriptionResumen del trabajo presentado al 12th International Mammalogical Congress (IMC): "Advances in mammalogy in a changing world", celebrado en Perth (Australia) del 9 al 14 de julio de 2017.-
dc.description.abstractAbundance estimation is paramount for the conservation and management of mammalian carnivores. The use of camera-traps for the study of carnivores has exponentially increased in the last decades, mostly for density estimation of species with individual natural coat patterns. Since canid species are not easily individually recognized from their pelage design, their population density is rarely estimated from camera-trap data. We assessed camera-trap data to estimate red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance in two areas of SW Europe with contrasting densities. We compared estimates from spatial mark-resight (SMR) models in a Bayesian approach, and assessed the effect of individual identifications by different observers, using as reference the density estimate including as identified exclusively those tagged individuals (unequivocally recognized). We also assessed whether individual identification with ear-tags and GPS-collar movement data improved the precision of estimates. Our results show a high variability among observers in the number of individuals identified and, consequently, in the density estimates, ranging between 1.05 and 1.58 foxes/km2 in the high-density area, and between 0.19 and 0.44 foxes/km2 in the low-density area. The density estimates obtained from spotlight-counts and distance sampling methodology are close to estimates from SMR models. Selected SMR models included a sex-effect, consistent with radio-tracking data indicating that males moved over larger ranges than females. The effects of behavior response and different detection due to lure/bait were also included in the models. We discuss the consequences and applications of these results for monitoring, conserving and managing canids with cryptic pelage patterns.-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.titleEstimating red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance with spatial mark-resight models and camera traps: the effects of tagging, observer and individual recognition-
dc.typecomunicación de congreso-
dc.date.updated2019-02-01T14:01:17Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.relation.csic-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794es_ES
item.openairetypecomunicación de congreso-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Comunicaciones congresos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

296
checked on 28-mar-2024

Download(s)

58
checked on 28-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.