Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDíez-Delgado, Iratxe-
dc.contributor.authorSevilla, Iker A.-
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorTanner, Eleanor-
dc.contributor.authorBarasona, José A.-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Andrew R.-
dc.contributor.authorLurz, Peter W. W.-
dc.contributor.authorBoots, Mike-
dc.contributor.authorFuente, José de la-
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez, Lucas-
dc.contributor.authorVicente, Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorGarrido, Joseba M.-
dc.contributor.authorJuste, Ramón A.-
dc.contributor.authorAranaz, Alicia-
dc.contributor.authorGortázar, Christian-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-25T09:41:10Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-25T09:41:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002-
dc.identifierissn: 0167-5877-
dc.identifiere-issn: 1873-1716-
dc.identifier.citationPreventive Veterinary Medicine 155: 11-20 (2018)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724-
dc.description.abstractThe Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is the main wild reservoir of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Mediterranean woodlands and a key risk factor for cattle tuberculosis (TB) breakdowns. Wild boar vaccination therefore has the potential to be a valuable tool for TB control. We tested two orally delivered vaccines, heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis (IV) and BCG, in four sites (two per vaccine type: one Managed and one Natural or unmanaged) during four years. TB was also monitored in 15 unvaccinated sites (spatial control), as well as in all sites from one year prior to intervention (temporal control). The rationale is that by vaccinating 2–6 month old wild boar piglets we can reduce disease at the population level during the study period. This is achievable due to the fast turnover of wild boar populations. Vaccine baits were deployed using selective piglet feeders and this method proved highly successful with uptake rates of 50 to 74% in Natural sites and 89 to 92% in Managed sites. This is relevant for the potential delivery of vaccines to control other diseases, too. Local wild boar TB prevalence at the beginning of the study was already high ranging from 50 to 100%. TB prevalence increased in unvaccinated sites (6%), while a significant decline occurred in the Managed IV site (34%). Changes recorded in the remaining sites were not significant. The short-term impact of vaccination observed in the field was complemented by mathematical modelling, representative of the field system, which examined the long-term impact and showed that vaccination of piglets reduced prevalence and increased abundance at the population level. We conclude that IV could become part of integrated TB control schemes, although its application must be tailored for each specific site.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis is a contribution to Plan Nacional I+D+i AGL2014-56305 from MINECO and EU FEDER, and to the EU–FP7 grant WildTBVac. E. Tanner was supported by The Maxwell Institute Graduate School in Analysis and its Applications, a Centre for Doctoral Training funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grant EP/L016508/01), the Scottish Funding Council, Heriot-Watt University and the University of Edinburgh. I. Díez-Delgado was supported by a predoctoral grant from MINECO.-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/613779-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/AGL2014-56305-C3-1-R-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectEpidemiological modelling-
dc.subjectHeat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis-
dc.subjectField vaccination-
dc.subjectBCG-
dc.subjectWild boar-
dc.subjectTuberculosis control-
dc.titleImpact of piglet oral vaccination against tuberculosis in endemic free-ranging wild boar populations-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002-
dc.date.updated2019-01-25T09:41:10Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)-
dc.contributor.funderScottish Funding Council-
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Edinburgh-
dc.contributor.funderEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK)-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.relation.csic-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000360es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000848es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid29786520-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

17
checked on 04-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on 17-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

217
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

64
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.