Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Impact of piglet oral vaccination against tuberculosis in endemic free-ranging wild boar populations |
Autor: | Díez-Delgado, Iratxe CSIC ORCID; Sevilla, Iker A.; Romero, Beatriz; Tanner, Eleanor; Barasona, José A. CSIC ORCID; White, Andrew R.; Lurz, Peter W. W.; Boots, Mike; Fuente, José de la CSIC ORCID ; Domínguez, Lucas CSIC; Vicente, Joaquín CSIC ORCID ; Garrido, Joseba M.; Juste, Ramón A.; Aranaz, Alicia; Gortázar, Christian CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Epidemiological modelling Heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis Field vaccination BCG Wild boar Tuberculosis control |
Fecha de publicación: | 2018 | Editor: | Elsevier | Citación: | Preventive Veterinary Medicine 155: 11-20 (2018) | Resumen: | The Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is the main wild reservoir of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Mediterranean woodlands and a key risk factor for cattle tuberculosis (TB) breakdowns. Wild boar vaccination therefore has the potential to be a valuable tool for TB control. We tested two orally delivered vaccines, heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis (IV) and BCG, in four sites (two per vaccine type: one Managed and one Natural or unmanaged) during four years. TB was also monitored in 15 unvaccinated sites (spatial control), as well as in all sites from one year prior to intervention (temporal control). The rationale is that by vaccinating 2–6 month old wild boar piglets we can reduce disease at the population level during the study period. This is achievable due to the fast turnover of wild boar populations. Vaccine baits were deployed using selective piglet feeders and this method proved highly successful with uptake rates of 50 to 74% in Natural sites and 89 to 92% in Managed sites. This is relevant for the potential delivery of vaccines to control other diseases, too. Local wild boar TB prevalence at the beginning of the study was already high ranging from 50 to 100%. TB prevalence increased in unvaccinated sites (6%), while a significant decline occurred in the Managed IV site (34%). Changes recorded in the remaining sites were not significant. The short-term impact of vaccination observed in the field was complemented by mathematical modelling, representative of the field system, which examined the long-term impact and showed that vaccination of piglets reduced prevalence and increased abundance at the population level. We conclude that IV could become part of integrated TB control schemes, although its application must be tailored for each specific site. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002 issn: 0167-5877 e-issn: 1873-1716 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IREC) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 15,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
PubMed Central
Citations
17
checked on 04-mar-2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
32
checked on 15-mar-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
31
checked on 29-feb-2024
Page view(s)
214
checked on 19-mar-2024
Download(s)
63
checked on 19-mar-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Artículos relacionados:
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.