Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Impact of piglet oral vaccination against tuberculosis in endemic free-ranging wild boar populations

AutorDíez-Delgado, Iratxe CSIC ORCID; Sevilla, Iker A.; Romero, Beatriz; Tanner, Eleanor; Barasona, José A. CSIC ORCID; White, Andrew R.; Lurz, Peter W. W.; Boots, Mike; Fuente, José de la CSIC ORCID ; Domínguez, Lucas CSIC; Vicente, Joaquín CSIC ORCID ; Garrido, Joseba M.; Juste, Ramón A.; Aranaz, Alicia; Gortázar, Christian CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveEpidemiological modelling
Heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis
Field vaccination
BCG
Wild boar
Tuberculosis control
Fecha de publicación2018
EditorElsevier
CitaciónPreventive Veterinary Medicine 155: 11-20 (2018)
ResumenThe Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is the main wild reservoir of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Mediterranean woodlands and a key risk factor for cattle tuberculosis (TB) breakdowns. Wild boar vaccination therefore has the potential to be a valuable tool for TB control. We tested two orally delivered vaccines, heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis (IV) and BCG, in four sites (two per vaccine type: one Managed and one Natural or unmanaged) during four years. TB was also monitored in 15 unvaccinated sites (spatial control), as well as in all sites from one year prior to intervention (temporal control). The rationale is that by vaccinating 2–6 month old wild boar piglets we can reduce disease at the population level during the study period. This is achievable due to the fast turnover of wild boar populations. Vaccine baits were deployed using selective piglet feeders and this method proved highly successful with uptake rates of 50 to 74% in Natural sites and 89 to 92% in Managed sites. This is relevant for the potential delivery of vaccines to control other diseases, too. Local wild boar TB prevalence at the beginning of the study was already high ranging from 50 to 100%. TB prevalence increased in unvaccinated sites (6%), while a significant decline occurred in the Managed IV site (34%). Changes recorded in the remaining sites were not significant. The short-term impact of vaccination observed in the field was complemented by mathematical modelling, representative of the field system, which examined the long-term impact and showed that vaccination of piglets reduced prevalence and increased abundance at the population level. We conclude that IV could become part of integrated TB control schemes, although its application must be tailored for each specific site.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724
DOI10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002
issn: 0167-5877
e-issn: 1873-1716
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

17
checked on 04-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on 15-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

214
checked on 19-mar-2024

Download(s)

63
checked on 19-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.