English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Impact of piglet oral vaccination against tuberculosis in endemic free-ranging wild boar populations

AuthorsDíez-Delgado, Iratxe ; Sevilla, Iker A.; Romero, Beatriz; Tanner, Eleanor; Barasona, José A. ; White, Andrew R.; Lurz, Peter W. W.; Boots, Mike; Fuente, José de la ; Domínguez, Lucas; Vicente, Joaquín ; Garrido, Joseba M.; Juste, Ramón A.; Aranaz, Alicia; Gortázar, Christian
KeywordsEpidemiological modelling
Heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis
Field vaccination
BCG
Wild boar
Tuberculosis control
Issue Date2018
PublisherElsevier
CitationPreventive Veterinary Medicine 155: 11-20 (2018)
AbstractThe Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) is the main wild reservoir of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Mediterranean woodlands and a key risk factor for cattle tuberculosis (TB) breakdowns. Wild boar vaccination therefore has the potential to be a valuable tool for TB control. We tested two orally delivered vaccines, heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis (IV) and BCG, in four sites (two per vaccine type: one Managed and one Natural or unmanaged) during four years. TB was also monitored in 15 unvaccinated sites (spatial control), as well as in all sites from one year prior to intervention (temporal control). The rationale is that by vaccinating 2–6 month old wild boar piglets we can reduce disease at the population level during the study period. This is achievable due to the fast turnover of wild boar populations. Vaccine baits were deployed using selective piglet feeders and this method proved highly successful with uptake rates of 50 to 74% in Natural sites and 89 to 92% in Managed sites. This is relevant for the potential delivery of vaccines to control other diseases, too. Local wild boar TB prevalence at the beginning of the study was already high ranging from 50 to 100%. TB prevalence increased in unvaccinated sites (6%), while a significant decline occurred in the Managed IV site (34%). Changes recorded in the remaining sites were not significant. The short-term impact of vaccination observed in the field was complemented by mathematical modelling, representative of the field system, which examined the long-term impact and showed that vaccination of piglets reduced prevalence and increased abundance at the population level. We conclude that IV could become part of integrated TB control schemes, although its application must be tailored for each specific site.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/174724
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.04.002
issn: 0167-5877
e-issn: 1873-1716
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.