Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174624
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting application in andalusian forests, Spain

AuthorsCampos Palacín, Pablo CSIC ; Caparrós Gass, Alejandro CSIC ORCID ; Oviedo Pro, José Luis CSIC ORCID; Ovando Pol, Paola CSIC ORCID ; Álvarez Farizo, Begoña CSIC; Díaz-Balteiro, Luis; Carranza, Juan; Beguería, Santiago CSIC ORCID ; Díaz, Mario; Herruzo Martínez, Antonio Casemiro; Martínez-Peña, Fernando; Soliño, Mario; Álvarez, Alejandro; Martínez-Jauregui, María; Pasalodos-Tato, María; Frutos, Pablo de; Aldea, Jorge; Almazán, Eloy; Concepción, Elena D. CSIC ORCID CVN; Mesa, Bruno; Romero, Carlos CSIC ORCID; Serrano-Notivoli, Roberto ; Fernández, Cristina; Torres-Porras, Jerónimo; Montero, Gregorio
KeywordsStandard accounts
Extended accounts
Ecosystem services
Environmental income
Simulated exchange values
Issue DateMar-2019
PublisherElsevier
CitationCampos P... [et al.]. Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting application in andalusian forests, Spain. Ecological Economics 157: 218-236 (2019)
AbstractNational accounting either ignores or fails to give due values to the ecosystem services, products, incomes and environmental assets of a country. To overcome these shortcomings, we apply spatially-explicit extended accounts that incorporate a novel environmental income indicator, which we test in the forests of Andalusia (Spain). Extended accounts incorporate nine farmer activities (timber, cork, firewood, nuts, livestock grazing, conservation forestry, hunting, residential services and private amenity) and seven government activities (fire services, free access recreation, free access mushroom, carbon, landscape conservation, threatened biodiversity and water yield). To make sure the valuation remains consistent with standard accounts, we simulate exchange values for non-market final forest product consumption in order to measure individual ecosystem services and environmental income indicators. Manufactured capital and environmental assets are also integrated. When comparing extended to standard accounts, our results are 3.6 times higher for gross value added. These differences are explained primarily by the omission in the standard accounts of carbon activities and undervaluation of private amenity, free access recreation, landscape and threatened biodiversity ecosystem services. Extended accounts measure a value of Andalusian forest ecosystem services 5.4 times higher than that measured using the valuation criteria of standard accounts.
Description19 Pags.- 5 Figs.- 5 Tabls. © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Under a Creative Commons license Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.017
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/174624
DOI10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.017
ISSN0921-8009
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Artículos
(CCHS-IPP) Artículos
(MNCN) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
BegueriaS_EcolEcon_2019.pdf2,03 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Jan 28, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

27
checked on Jan 24, 2022

Page view(s)

830
checked on Jan 28, 2022

Download(s)

367
checked on Jan 28, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.