Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/17429
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastillejo Sánchez, M. Ángeles-
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado, Ana M.-
dc.contributor.authorDumas-Gaudot, Eliane-
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Aparicio, Mónica-
dc.contributor.authorSusín, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorRubiales, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorJorrín, Jesús V.-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-05T09:29:54Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-05T09:29:54Z-
dc.date.issued2009-07-03-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Genomics 10:294 (2009)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2164-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/17429-
dc.description17 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, 16 additional files.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Background] Parasitic angiosperm Orobanche crenata infection represents a major constraint for the cultivation of legumes worldwide. The level of protection achieved to date is either incomplete or ephemeral. Hence, an efficient control of the parasite requires a better understanding of its interaction and associated resistance mechanisms at molecular levels.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Results] In order to study the plant response to this parasitic plant and the molecular basis of the resistance we have used a proteomic approach. The root proteome of two accessions of the model legume Medicago truncatula displaying differences in their resistance phenotype, in control as well as in inoculated plants, over two time points (21 and 25 days post infection), has been compared. We report quantitative as well as qualitative differences in the 2-DE maps between early- (SA 27774) and late-resistant (SA 4087) genotypes after Coomassie and silver-staining: 69 differential spots were observed between non-inoculated genotypes, and 42 and 25 spots for SA 4087 and SA 27774 non-inoculated and inoculated plants, respectively. In all, 49 differential spots were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) following MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry. Many of the proteins showing significant differences between genotypes and after parasitic infection belong to the functional category of defense and stress-related proteins. A number of spots correspond to proteins with the same function, and might represent members of a multigenic family or post-transcriptional forms of the same protein.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Conclusion] The results obtained suggest the existence of a generic defense mechanism operating during the early stages of infection and differing in both genotypes. The faster response to the infection observed in the SA 27774 genotype might be due to the action of proteins targeted against key elements needed for the parasite's successful infection, such as protease inhibitors. Our data are discussed and compared with those previously obtained with pea [1] and transcriptomic analysis of other plant-pathogen and plant-parasitic plant systems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank European Union Grain Legumes Integrated Project and Andalusian project P07-AGR-2883 for financial support.en_US
dc.format.extent259768 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher’s version-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrobanche crenataen_US
dc.subjectMedicago truncatulaen_US
dc.titleDifferential expression proteomics to investigate responses and resistance to Orobanche crenata in Medicago truncatulaen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2164-10-294-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-294en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19575787-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1471-2164-10-294.pdf975,87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

PubMed Central
Citations

5
checked on May 4, 2022

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
checked on May 19, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on May 19, 2022

Page view(s)

378
checked on May 26, 2022

Download(s)

200
checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.