English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174232
COMPARTIR / IMPACTO:
Estadísticas
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Título

Evaluation of five serologic assays for bovine tuberculosis surveillance in domestic free-range pigs from southern Spain

AutorCardoso-Toset, Fernando; Luque, Inmaculada; Carrasco, Librado; Jurado-Martos, Francisco; Risalde, María Ángeles; Venteo, Ángel; Infantes-Lorenzo, José Antonio; Bezos, Javier; Rueda, Paloma; Tapia, Istar; Gortázar, Christian ; Domínguez, Lucas; Domínguez, Mercedes; Gomez-Laguna, Jaime
Palabras claveTuberculosis-like lesions
bPPD
Serologic assays
Pigs
MTC
MPB83
Fecha de publicación2017
EditorElsevier
CitaciónPreventive Veterinary Medicine 137A: 101-104 (2017)
ResumenIn countries where bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is still prevalent the contact among different animal species in extensive systems contributes to the circulation of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) and other members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC). Thus, free-range pigs can develop subclinical infections and may contribute to disease spread to bovine and wildlife. Serodiagnosis has been proposed as a screening tool for detecting infected pig herds; however, the value of this method to obtain an accurate diagnosis in this species is still not clear. In this study, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) estimates of four ELISAs and a lateral flow immunochromatographic antibody assay based on different M. bovis antigens, including MPB70 and MPB83 proteins, were evaluated in naturally infected domestic free-range pigs. For this purpose, submandibular lymph nodes and blood samples from 217 pigs from both TB-infected and historically negative farms were sampled at slaughterhouse and analysed by gross examination, histopathology, bacteriological culture and qPCR. Se and Sp estimates of the 5 evaluated assays ranged from 66.1% to 78% (CI from 52.6 to 87.7%) and from 98.9% to 100% (CI from 93.8 to 100%), respectively. Results of our study suggest that all the evaluated assays could be used as a first screening tool to conduct bTB surveillance in domestic pigs at population level; however, animals from seropositive herds should later be surveyed by other methods in order to reduce false negative results.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/174232
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.12.016
issn: 0167-5877
e-issn: 1873-1716
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.