Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173839
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Antibody detection tests improve the sensitivity of tuberculosis diagnosis in cattle |
Autor: | Casal, Carmen; Infantes-Lorenzo, José Antonio; Risalde, María Ángeles CSIC ORCID; Díez-Guerrier, Alberto; Domínguez, Mercedes; Moreno, Inmaculada CSIC ORCID; Romero, Beatriz; Juan, Lucía de; Sáez, José L.; Juste, Ramón A.; Gortázar, Christian CSIC ORCID ; Domínguez, Lucas CSIC; Bezos, Javier | Palabras clave: | Interferon-γ assay Intradermal tests Serology Bovine tuberculosis |
Fecha de publicación: | 2017 | Editor: | Elsevier | Citación: | Research in Veterinary Science 112: 214-221 (2017) | Resumen: | We evaluated the sensitivity (Se) of the single cervical intradermal tuberculin (SIT) test, two interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) assays and three different antibody detection techniques for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) diagnosis in 131 mixed beef breed cattle. The results of the diagnostic techniques performed over the whole herd, and over the animals confirmed as infected based on the presence of lesions compatible with the disease and/or M. bovis isolation were compared to determine apparent prevalence (AP) and Se. The Se of the SIT test (severe interpretation) was 63.7% (95% CI, 54.54–72.00), while the Se of the IFN-γ assays ranged between 60.2% and 92%. The proportion of infected cattle detected by the different antibody detection techniques ranged from 65.5% to 87.6%. Three of the antibody detection techniques yielded a significant higher (p < 0.05) Se than that achieved with the official diagnostic techniques. In addition, the interpretation in parallel of cellular and antibody detection techniques reached the highest Se: 98.2% (95% CI, 93.78–99.51) suggesting that the use of diagnostic techniques detecting both cellular and humoral responses could be considered as an alternative in the control of bTB outbreaks in high prevalence settings. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173839 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.05.012 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.05.012 e-issn: 1532-2661 issn: 0034-5288 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IREC) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 15,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
PubMed Central
Citations
30
checked on 16-mar-2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
55
checked on 14-mar-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
54
checked on 24-feb-2024
Page view(s)
290
checked on 19-mar-2024
Download(s)
46
checked on 19-mar-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Artículos relacionados:
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.