English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173839
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Antibody detection tests improve the sensitivity of tuberculosis diagnosis in cattle

AuthorsCasal, Carmen; Infantes-Lorenzo, José Antonio; Risalde, María Ángeles; Díez-Guerrier, Alberto; Domínguez, Mercedes; Moreno, Inmaculada; Romero, Beatriz; Juan, Lucía de; Sáez, José L.; Juste, Ramón A.; Gortázar, Christian ; Domínguez, Lucas; Bezos, Javier
KeywordsInterferon-γ assay
Intradermal tests
Serology
Bovine tuberculosis
Issue Date2017
PublisherElsevier
CitationResearch in Veterinary Science 112: 214-221 (2017)
AbstractWe evaluated the sensitivity (Se) of the single cervical intradermal tuberculin (SIT) test, two interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) assays and three different antibody detection techniques for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) diagnosis in 131 mixed beef breed cattle. The results of the diagnostic techniques performed over the whole herd, and over the animals confirmed as infected based on the presence of lesions compatible with the disease and/or M. bovis isolation were compared to determine apparent prevalence (AP) and Se. The Se of the SIT test (severe interpretation) was 63.7% (95% CI, 54.54–72.00), while the Se of the IFN-γ assays ranged between 60.2% and 92%. The proportion of infected cattle detected by the different antibody detection techniques ranged from 65.5% to 87.6%. Three of the antibody detection techniques yielded a significant higher (p < 0.05) Se than that achieved with the official diagnostic techniques. In addition, the interpretation in parallel of cellular and antibody detection techniques reached the highest Se: 98.2% (95% CI, 93.78–99.51) suggesting that the use of diagnostic techniques detecting both cellular and humoral responses could be considered as an alternative in the control of bTB outbreaks in high prevalence settings.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/173839
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.05.012
e-issn: 1532-2661
issn: 0034-5288
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.