English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173721
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


A comparison between glass fiber and membrane filters for the estimation of phytoplankton POC and DOC production

AuthorsMorán, Xosé Anxelu G. ; Gasol, Josep M. ; Arin, Laura ; Estrada, Marta
KeywordsPOC and DOC production
Cell abundance
Filter types
Issue DateOct-1999
PublisherInter Research
CitationMarine Ecology Progress Series 187: 31-41 (1999)
AbstractWe tested the performance of 2 types of glass fiber filters (GF/F: 0.7 pm; GF/C: 1.2 μm) and 2 membrane filters (PC0.2: polycarbonate 0.2 pm; CE0.22: mixed cellulose esters 0.22 μm) in estimating chlorophyll a and primary production with the 14C technique. Four experiments were carried out with water samples from the NW Mediterranean, the NE Atlantic and the Antarctic Ocean. The first experiment compared measurements of particulate organic carbon (POC) production whereas the other 3 also considered total (TOC) and dissolved (DOC) carbon fixation. No significant differences among filters were found regarding chlorophyll a retention but large discrepancies existed in the amount of labelled organic carbon retained in all the experiments. Both types of glass fiber filters, especially GF/F, yielded higher values of apparent PO14C recovery than the membrane filters. The GF/F-derived POC production rates were up to twice the PC0.2-derived rates and 63 % higher than CE0.22-derived ones. Accordingly, the estimated rates of phytoplanktonic DOC production were higher with the membrane filters in comparison to the GF/F ones. This discrepancy was attributed to a high DO14C adsorption to the glass fibers of GF filters. Due to uncertainties in the magnitude of this process in other samples, we conclude that GF filters are not suitable when particulate primary production must be measured without interference of released dissolved products, and that membrane filters should be used instead
Description11 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.3354/meps187031
Identifiersdoi: 10.3354/meps187031
issn: 0171-8630
e-issn: 1616-1599
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Moran_et_al_1999.pdf1,2 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.