Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/17188
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorAlarcón Cabañero, Juan José-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Blanco, María Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorNicolás Nicolás, Emilio-
dc.contributor.authorEgea, José-
dc.contributor.authorDicenta, Federico-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-28T07:36:40Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-28T07:36:40Z-
dc.date.issued2002-11-30-
dc.identifier.citationActa Horticulturae 591: 345-349 (2002)en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-90-66058-16-3-
dc.identifier.issn0567-7572-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/17188-
dc.description.abstractPotted plants of two almond (Prunus dulcis Miller) cultivars, ‘Antoñeta’ and ‘Marta’, grafted onto ‘Garrigues’ and ‘GF677’ rootstocks, were subjected to two different cycles of drought. In one case, the stressed plants were subjected to drought by withholding irrigation for 5 days. In the other experiment, the drought treatment was imposed by reduction of the daily water applied (by 50% with respect to the control plants) during 45 days. Control plants were irrigated daily to 50% field capacity. In both experiments, the water stress induced a decrease of leaf water potential and leaf stomatal conductance. The values of leaf water potential were lower in the trees grafted onto ‘Garrigues’, independently of the cultivar or treatment considered. These trees also showed higher levels of leaf stomatal conductance. The results suggest that ‘GF677’ is more drought tolerant than ‘Garrigues’ seedlings as a rootstock, because it avoided the loss of water via transpiration and maintained the leaf water content under stress. The behaviour of leaf water relations in both cultivars was similar during the long term experiment. However, when the stress was severe, the effect of drought on leaf water potential of ‘Marta’ was higher, indicating that responses for drought resistance in leaves of ‘Antoñeta’ are faster, and probably more efficient, than those shown by ‘Marta’.en_US
dc.format.extent579917 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeimage/jpeg-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Society for Horticultural Scienceen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlmondsen_US
dc.subjectDroughten_US
dc.subjectLeaf stomatal conductanceen_US
dc.subjectLeaf water potentialen_US
dc.subjectStem growthen_US
dc.titleEffects of drought on shoot water relations in “Antoñeta” and “Marta” almonds grafted onto “Garrigues” seedlings and “GF 677” Rootstocksen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.actahort.org/books/591/591_53.htmen_US
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (CEBAS) Comunicaciones congresos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

323
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.