English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/170035
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Lysogenization of Staphylococcus aureus RN450 by phages ϕ11 and ϕ80α leads to the activation of the SigB regulon

AuthorsFernández, Lucía; González, Silvia; Quiles-Puchalt, Nuria; Gutiérrez, Diana ; Penadés, José R. ; García Suárez, María Pilar ; Rodríguez González, Ana
Issue Date23-Aug-2018
PublisherSpringer Nature
CitationScientific Reports 8: 12662 (2017)
AbstractStaphylococcus aureus is a major opportunistic pathogen that commonly forms biofilms on various biotic and abiotic surfaces. Also, most isolates are known to carry prophages in their genomes. With this in mind, it seems that acquiring a better knowledge of the impact of prophages on the physiology of S. aureus biofilm cells would be useful for developing strategies to eliminate this pathogen. Here, we performed RNA-seq analysis of biofilm cells formed by S. aureus RN450 and two derived strains carrying prophages ϕ11 and ϕ80α. The lysogenic strains displayed increased biofilm formation and production of the carotenoid pigment staphyloxanthin. These phenotypes could be partly explained by the differences in gene expression displayed by prophage-harboring strains, namely an activation of the alternative sigma factor (SigB) regulon and downregulation of genes controlled by the Agr quorum-sensing system, especially the decreased transcription of genes encoding dispersion factors like proteases. Nonetheless, spontaneous lysis of part of the population could also contribute to the increased attached biomass. Interestingly, it appears that the phage CI protein plays a role in orchestrating these phage-host interactions, although more research is needed to confirm this possibility. Likewise, future studies should examine the impact of these two prophages during the infection.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31107-z
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/170035
DOI10.1038/s41598-018-31107-z
E-ISSN2045-2322
Appears in Collections:(IPLA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018_Sci_Rep.pdf2,4 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.