English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/168636
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Environmental determinism, and not interspecific competition, drives morphological variability in Australasian warblers (Acanthizidae)

AuthorsGarcía-Navas, Vicente CSIC ORCID; Rodríguez-Rey, Marta; Marki, Petter Z.; Christidis, L.
KeywordsMacroevolution
Foraging niche
Climate
Allopatric
Acanthizids
Passerines
Phenotypic landscape
Morphological convergence
Issue Date2018
CitationEcology and Evolution 8: 3871- 3882 (2018)
AbstractInterspecific competition is thought to play a key role in determining the coexistence of closely related species within adaptive radiations. Competition for ecological resources can lead to different outcomes from character displacement to, ultimately, competitive exclusion. Accordingly, divergent natural selection should disfavor those species that are the most similar to their competitor in resource use, thereby increasing morphological disparity. Here, we examined ecomorphological variability within an Australo-Papuan bird radiation, the Acanthizidae, which include both allopatric and sympatric complexes. In addition, we investigated whether morphological similarities between species are related to environmental factors at fine scale (foraging niche) and/or large scale (climate). Contrary to that predicted by the competition hypothesis, we did not find a significant correlation between the morphological similarities found between species and their degree of range overlap. Comparative modeling based on both a priori and data-driven identification of selective regimes suggested that foraging niche is a poor predictor of morphological variability in acanthizids. By contrast, our results indicate that climatic conditions were an important factor in the formation of morphological variation. We found a significant negative correlation between species scores for PC1 (positively associated to tarsus length and tail length) and both temperature and precipitation, whereas PC2 (positively associated to bill length and wing length) correlated positively with precipitation. In addition, we found that species inhabiting the same region are closer to each other in morphospace than to species outside that region regardless of genus to which they belong or its foraging strategy. Our results indicate that the conservative body form of acanthizids is one that can work under a wide variety of environments (an all-purpose morphology), and the observed interspecific similarity is probably driven by the common response to environment.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/168636
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3925
Identifiersdoi: 10.1002/ece3.3925
issn: 2045-7758
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Garc-a-Navas_et_al-2018-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdf1,05 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.