Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/167325COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
 SHARE
 CORE
BASE
|
|
| Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
| Título: | Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review |
Autor: | Mačić, Vesna; Corrales, Xavier; Katsanevakis, Stelios | Palabras clave: | Invasive alien species Management actions Mitigation Non-indigenous species Systematic conservation planning |
Fecha de publicación: | may-2018 | Editor: | Frontiers Media | Citación: | Frontiers in Marine Science 5: 178 (2018) | Resumen: | Biological invasions threaten biodiversity in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems, requiring substantial conservation and management efforts. To examine how the conservation planning literature addresses biological invasions and if planning in the marine environment could benefit from experiences in the freshwater and terrestrial systems, we conducted a global systematic review. Out of 1,149 scientific articles mentioning both “conservation planning” and “alien” or any of its alternative terms, 70 articles met our selection criteria. Most of the studies were related to the terrestrial environment, while only 10% focused on the marine environment. The main conservation targets were species (mostly vertebrates) rather than habitats or ecosystems. Apart from being mentioned, alien species were considered of concern for conservation in only 46% of the cases, while mitigation measures were proposed in only 13% of the cases. The vast majority of the studies (73%) ignored alien species in conservation planning even if their negative impacts were recognized. In 20% of the studies, highly invaded areas were avoided in the planning, while in 6% of the cases such areas were prioritized for conservation. In the latter case, two opposing approaches led to the selection of invaded areas: either alien and native biodiversity were treated equally in setting conservation targets, i.e., alien species were also considered as ecological features requiring protection, or more commonly invaded sites were prioritized for the implementation of management actions to control or eradicate invasive alien species. When the “avoid” approach was followed, in most of the cases highly impacted areas were either excluded or invasive alien species were included in the estimation of a cost function to be minimized. Most of the studies that followed a “protect” or “avoid” approach dealt with terrestrial or freshwater features but in most cases the followed approach could be transferred to the marine environment. Gaps and needs for further research are discussed and we propose an 11-step framework to account for biological invasions into the systematic conservation planning design | Descripción: | Mačić, Vesna ... et al.-- 13 pages, 4 figures, 1 table, supplementary material https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00178/full#supplementary-material | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00178 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/167325 | DOI: | 10.3389/fmars.2018.00178 | E-ISSN: | 2296-7745 |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | (ICM) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
| Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macic_et_al_2018.pdf | 656,29 kB | Adobe PDF |  Visualizar/Abrir | |
| Macic_et_al_2018_suppl_1.PDF | 62,2 kB | Adobe PDF |  Visualizar/Abrir | |
| Macic_et_al_2018_suppl_2.xlsx | 36,96 kB | Microsoft Excel XML | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
77
checked on 18-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
74
checked on 29-feb-2024
Page view(s)
288
checked on 23-abr-2024
Download(s)
340
checked on 23-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons
