Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/167319
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLombarte, Antonies_ES
dc.contributor.authorMiletić, M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorKovacic, Marceloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorOtero-Ferrer, Jose Luíses_ES
dc.contributor.authorTuset, Víctor M.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-03T10:55:34Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-03T10:55:34Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Fish Biology 92(6): 1768-1787 (2018)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0022-1112-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/167319-
dc.description20 pages, 6 figures, 3 tableses_ES
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Journal of Fish Biology (2018) 92, 1768-1787, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13615. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we describe and analyse the morphology of the sagitta, the largest otolith, of 25 species of Gobiidae inhabiting the Adriatic and north‐western Mediterranean seas. Our goal was to test the usefulness and efficiency of sagittal otoliths for species identification. Our analysis of otolith contours was based on mathematical descriptors called wavelets, which are related to multi‐scale decompositions of contours. Two methods of classification were used: an iterative system based on 10 wavelets that searches the Anàlisi de Formes d'Otòlits (AFORO) database and a discriminant method based only on the fifth wavelet. With the exception of paedomorphic species, the results showed that otolith anatomy and morphometry can be used as diagnostic characters distinguishing the three Mediterranean phylogenetic goby lineages (Pomatoschistus or sand‐goby lineage, Aphia lineage and Gobius lineage). The main anatomical differences were related to overall shape (square to rhomboid), the development and shape of the postero‐dorsal and antero‐ventral lobes and the degree of convexity of dorsal and ventral margins. Iterative classifications and discriminant analysis of otolith contour provided very similar results. In both cases, more than 70% of specimens were correctly classified to species and more than 80% to genus. Iterations in the larger AFORO database (including 216 families of teleosts) attained a 100% correct classification at the family leveles_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study were financed by projects “AFORO3D” (Ref. CTM2010-19701) and “CLIFISH” (CTM2015-66400-C3-3-R) of the Spanish National Research Planses_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFisheries Society of the British Isleses_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CTM2015-66400-C3-3-R-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_EN
dc.subjectContoures_ES
dc.subjectGobiidses_ES
dc.subjectMediterranean Seaes_ES
dc.subjectMorphologyes_ES
dc.subjectOtolith shapees_ES
dc.subjectPhylogenyes_ES
dc.titleIdentifying sagittal otoliths of Mediterranean Sea gobies: variability among phylogenetic lineageses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jfb.13615-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13615es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1095-8649-
dc.rights.licensehttps://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html-
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICM) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Lombarte_et_al_2018.pdf901,02 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on 24-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

26
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

273
checked on 28-mar-2024

Download(s)

362
checked on 28-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.