Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16714
Share/Export:
![]() ![]() |
|
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Title: | Evaluating the Flow-Cytometric Nucleic Acid Double-Staining Protocol in Realistic Situations of Planktonic Bacterial Death |
Authors: | Falcioni, Tania; Papa, Stefano; Gasol, Josep M. CSIC ORCID | Issue Date: | Mar-2008 | Publisher: | American Society for Microbiology | Citation: | Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74(6): 1767-1779 (2008) | Abstract: | Since heterotrophic prokaryotes play an important biogeochemical role in aquatic ecosystems and have a high capacity to survive in extreme environments, easy-to-perform protocols that probe their physiological states and the effects of environmental variables on those states are highly desired. Some methodologies combine a general nucleic acid stain with a membrane integrity probe. We calibrated one of these, the nucleic acid double-staining (NADS) protocol (G. Gre ́gori, S. Citterio, A. Ghiani, M. Labra, S. Sgorbati, S. Brown, and M. Denis, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4662–4670, 2001), determining the optimal stain concentrations in seawater and the response to conditions that generate prokaryote death (such as heat) and to conditions that are known to produce death in plankton, such as nutrient limitation or flagellate grazing. The protocol was validated by comparison to two methods used to detect viability: active respiration by 5-cyano 2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) and incorporation of tritiated leucine. We show that concentrations in the range of 5 to 20 | Description: | 13 pages, 3 tables, 5 figures, http://icm.csic.es/bio/projects/icmicrobis/pdf | Publisher version (URL): | https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01668-07 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16714 | DOI: | 10.1128/AEM.01668-07 | ISSN: | 0099-2240 | E-ISSN: | 1098-5336 |
Appears in Collections: | (ICM) Artículos |
Show full item record
Review this work
PubMed Central
Citations
13
checked on May 19, 2022
SCOPUSTM
Citations
72
checked on May 16, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
69
checked on May 17, 2022
Page view(s)
386
checked on May 21, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Dimensions
Related articles:
WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.