English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/166884
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Molecular characterization of pseudomonodelphic dagger nematodes of the genus Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Longidoridae) in Costa Rica, with notes on Xiphinema setariae Tarjan, 1964

AuthorsPeraza-Padilla, Walter; Archidona-Yuste, Antonio; Ferris, Howard; Zamora-Araya, Tatiana; Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, C. ; Palomares Rius, Juan E. ; Subbotin, Sergei A.; Castillo, Pablo
KeywordsBayesian inference
Issue DateJul-2017
PublisherSpringer Nature
CitationEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology 148(3): 739-747 (2017)
AbstractPseudomonodelphic dagger nematodes of the genus Xiphinema are characterized by having one of the genital branches reduced and lacking an ovary. They are usually reported from tropical regions. Nematode surveys conducted during rainy seasons in Costa Rica resulted in detection of several Xiphinema costaricense populations, but also other pseudomonodelphic and didelphic species of Xiphinema. We undertook detailed integrative morphometric and molecular studies using D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S rDNA, and ITS1-rDNA. From those studies, we also identified several populations of Xiphinema krugi and two populations of Xiphinema setariae with characteristics in agreement with those of the original and later descriptions of these species. The phylogenetic analyses of these species with other representatives of Xiphinema spp. indicated that pseudomonodelphic species are phylogenetically related (X. costaricense and X. krugi). On the basis of ITS1 sequences of X. costaricense and X. variegatum from Brazil, as well as similar morphology and morphometrics of both species, the latter is proposed here as a junior synonym of the former. Also, our morphometric data showed some intraspecific variability within X. setariae, which in combination with the molecular evidence, suggests that X. setariae and X. vulgare need to be considered as a single taxon.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1124-2
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.