English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/164434
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDrummond, Jennifer D.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Laurel G.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Pinzón, Ricardoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPackman, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Judson W.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T07:59:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-07T07:59:22Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 123 : doi:10.1029/2017JG004212 (2018)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/164434-
dc.descriptionEste artículo contiene 15 páginas, 2 tablas, 4 figuras.es_ES
dc.description.abstractStream restoration goals include reducing erosion and increasing hyporheic exchange to promote biogeochemical processing and improve water quality. Little is known, however, about fine particle dynamics in response to stream restoration. Fine particles (<100 μm) are exchanged with transient storage areas near and within streambeds and banks. Fine particle retention directly impacts carbon and nutrient cycling by supporting benthic and hyporheic primary production, but overaccumulation of fine particle deposits can impair metabolism by burying benthic biofilms and reducing streambed permeability. We analyzed the transport and retention of water and fine particles at both the reach and local scales in a restored urban stream, 9 years postrestoration. We injected conservative solute and fine particle tracers under summer baseflow conditions and monitored their distribution between surface water, porewaters, and storage areas (i.e., biofilms, hyporheic zones, and slow surface waters). Comparison of the results to a nearby unrestored stream demonstrate that the restored reach had 10–45 times greater exchange of fine particles with transient storage zones, but 5 times lower rate of net particle immobilization. Local-scale results showed that restoration increased fine particle exchange with short-term storage areas but did not increase long-term particle retention. Thus, the restored stream rapidly exchanged fine sediments with transient storage areas, but did not store fine sediments as efficiently as the unrestored stream. The decreased retention of particulate organic matter in the restored stream may reduce biogeochemical processes, such as denitrification, by not providing sufficient organic carbon or the surface area required for microbial colonization.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by NSF grants EAR-0810270 and EAR-1344280, the U.S Geological Survey National Water Quality Program and National Research Programs, an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) STAR Fellowship and NSF EAR-PF awarded to J. Drummond, and a CUAHSI Pathfinder award to R. González-Pinzón.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Uniones_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.titleLess Fine Particle Retention in a Restored Versus Unrestored Urban Stream: Balance Between Hyporheic Exchange, Resuspension, and Immobilizationes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004212es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Restringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.