English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/164363
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Morphostructure, tectono‐sedimentary evolution and seismic potential of the Horseshoe Fault, SW Iberian Margin

AuthorsMartínez-Loriente, S. CSIC ORCID ; Gràcia, Eulàlia CSIC ORCID ; Bartolomé, Rafael CSIC ORCID ; Perea, Héctor ; Klaeschen, Dirk; Dañobeitia, Juan José CSIC ; Zitellini, Nevio; Wynn, Russell B.; Masson, Douglas G.
Issue DateFeb-2018
PublisherEuropean Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
CitationBasin Research 30(S1): 382-400 (2018)
AbstractHigh‐resolution acoustic and seismic data acquired 100 km offshore Cape São Vicente, image with unprecedented detail one of the largest active reverse faults of the SW Iberian Margin, the Horseshoe Fault (HF). The HF region is an area seismogenically active, source of the largest magnitude instrumental and historical earthquake (Mw > 6) occurred in the SW Iberian Margin. The HF corresponds to a N40 trending, 110 km long, and NW‐verging active thrust that affects the whole sedimentary sequence and reaches up to the seafloor, generating a relief of more than 1 km. The along‐strike structural variability as well as fault trend suggests that the HF is composed by three main sub‐segments: North (N25), Central (N50) and South (N45). Swath‐bathymetry, TOBI sidescan sonar backscatter and parametric echosounder TOPAS profiles reveal the surface morphology of the HF block, characterized by several, steep (20°) small scarps located on the hangingwall, and a succession of mass transport deposits (i.e. turbidites) on its footwall, located in the Horseshoe Abyssal Plain. A succession of pre‐stack depth‐migrated multichannel seismic reflection profiles across the HF and neighbouring areas allowed us to constrain their seismo‐stratigraphy, structural geometry, tectono‐sedimentary evolution from Upper Jurassic to present‐day, and to calculate their fault parameters. Finally, on the basis of segment length, surface fault area and seismogenic depth we evaluated the seismic potential of the HF, which in the worst‐case scenario may generate an earthquake of magnitude Mw 7.8 ± 0.1. Thus, considering the tectonic behaviour and near‐shore location, the HF should be recognized in seismic and tsunami hazard assessment models of Western Europe and North Africa
Description19 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables, supporting information https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12225
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12225
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/164363
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12225
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/bre.12225
issn: 0950-091X
e-issn: 1365-2117
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
(UTM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.