English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/164074
COMPARTIR / IMPACTO:
Estadísticas
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Título

Testing vision with angular and radial multifocal designs using Adaptive Optics

AutorViñas, María ; Dorronsoro, Carlos ; González, Verónica ; Cortés, Daniel ; Radhakrishnan, A. ; Marcos, Susana
Palabras clavePresbyopia
Spatial Light Modulators
Multifocal corrections
Adaptive Optics
Fecha de publicación2-ago-2016
EditorElsevier
CitaciónVision Research 132: 85-96 (2017)
ResumenMultifocal vision corrections are increasingly used solutions for presbyopia. In the current study we have evaluated, optically and psychophysically, the quality provided by multizone radial and angular segmented phase designs. Optical and relative visual quality were evaluated using 8 subjects, testing 6 phase designs. Optical quality was evaluated by means of Visual Strehl-based-metrics (VS). The relative visual quality across designs was obtained through a psychophysical paradigm in which images viewed through 210 pairs of phase patterns were perceptually judged. A custom-developed Adaptive Optics (AO) system, including a Hartmann-Shack sensor and an electromagnetic deformable mirror, to measure and correct the eye¿s aberrations, and a phase-only reflective Spatial Light Modulator, to simulate the phase designs, was developed for this study. The multizone segmented phase designs had 2¿4 zones of progressive power (0 to +3D) in either radial or angular distributions. The response of an ¿ideal observer¿ purely responding on optical grounds to the same psychophysical test performed on subjects was calculated from the VS curves, and compared with the relative visual quality results. Optical and psychophysical pattern-comparison tests showed that while 2-zone segmented designs (angular & radial) provided better performance for far and near vision, 3- and 4-zone segmented angular designs performed better for intermediate vision. AO-correction of natural aberrations of the subjects modified the response for the different subjects but general trends remained. The differences in perceived quality across the different multifocal patterns are, in a large extent, explained by optical factors. AO is an excellent tool to simulate multifocal refractions before they are manufactured or delivered to the patient, and to assess the effects of the native optics to their performance.
Descripción12 pags., 12 figs.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.011
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/164074
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.011
issn: 0042-6989
Aparece en las colecciones: (CFMAC-IO) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
VRTesting.pdf2,68 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.