English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/163596
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Absolute earthquake locations using 3-D versus 1-D velocity models below a local seismic network: example from the Pyrenees

AuthorsTheunissen, T.; Chevrot, S.; Sylvander, M.; Monteiller, V.; Calvet, M.; Villaseñor, Antonio ; Benahmed, S.; Pauchet, H.; Grimaud, F.
KeywordsEarthquake hazards
Seismic tomography
Crustal structure
Seismology
Issue DateMar-2018
PublisherOxford University Press
CitationGeophysical Journal International, 212(3): 1806–1828 (2018)
AbstractLocal seismic networks are usually designed so that earthquakes are located inside them (primary azimuthal gap < < 180 degrees) and close to the seismic stations (0-100 km). With these local or near-regional networks (0 degrees-5 degrees), many seismological observatories still routinely locate earthquakes using 1-D velocity models. Moving towards 3-D location algorithms requires robust 3-D velocity models. This work takes advantage of seismic monitoring spanning more than 30 yr in the Pyrenean region. We investigate the influence of a well-designed 3-D model with station corrections including basins structure and the geometry of the Mohorovicic discontinuity on earthquake locations. In the most favourable cases (GAP < 180 degrees and distance to the first station lower than 15 km), results using 1-D velocity models are very similar to 3-D results. The horizontal accuracy in the 1-D case can be higher than in the 3-D case if lateral variations in the structure are not properly resolved. Depth is systematically better resolved in the 3-D model even on the boundaries of the seismic network (GAP > 180 degrees and distance to the first station higher than 15 km). Errors on velocity models and accuracy of absolute earthquake locations are assessed based on a reference data set made of active seismic, quarry blasts and passive temporary experiments. Solutions and uncertainties are estimated using the probabilistic approach of the NonLinLoc (NLLoc) software based on Equal Differential Time. Some updates have been added to NLLoc to better focus on the final solution (outlier exclusion, multiscale grid search, S-phases weighting). Errors in the probabilistic approach are defined to take into account errors on velocity models and on arrival times. The seismicity in the final 3-D catalogue is located with a horizontal uncertainty of about 2.0 +/- 1.9 km and a vertical uncertainty of about 3.0 +/- 2.0 km.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1093/gji/ggx472
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/163596
DOI10.1093/gji/ggx472
ISSN0956-540X
E-ISSN1365-246X
Appears in Collections:(ICTJA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Villaseñor_Geophysical_Journal_International_202_3_1806.pdf12,96 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.