English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16331
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 161 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Título

The sediment delivery problem revisited

AutorVente, Joris de ; Poesen, Jean; Arabkhedri, M.; Verstraeten, Gert
Palabras claveErosion processes
Modelling
Scale
Sediment Delivery Ratio
Sediment transport
Sediment yield
Fecha de publicación2007
EditorSage Publications
CitaciónProgress in Physical Geography (31)2: 155-178 (2007)
ResumenUnderstanding the sediment delivery process at the drainage basin scale remains a challenge in erosion and sedimentation research. In the absence of reliable spatially distributed process-based models for the prediction of sediment transport at the drainage basin scale, area-specific sediment yield (SSY; t km—2 y—1) is often assumed to decrease with increasing drainage basin area (A). As the measurement of A is relatively simple, this assumption is frequently used for prediction of SSY in ungauged basins. However, over the last two decades several studies reported a positive or non-linear relation between A and SSY. Various authors have suggested diverse explanations for these opposing trends. This paper provides an overview of the different observed trends and summarizes the explanations for each trend. Furthermore, three typical trends are identified to conceptualize the main driving forces of the relation between A and SSY. First of all, it is emphasized that erosion and sediment deposition processes are scale dependent, and going from small (<m2) to larger areas (km2) more erosion processes become active leading to a rise in SSY with increasing A. However, for larger areas (>km2) erosion rates generally decrease and deposition in sediment sinks increases due to decreasing slope gradients, and so SSY decreases with increasing A. Next, land-cover conditions and human impact determine if hillslope erosion is dominant over channel erosion or vice versa. In the first case, SSY is expected to decrease with increasing A, while in the latter case SSY will show a continuous positive relation with A. Only for very large areas (A > ~104 km2) a decrease in SSY is observed when drainage density decreases or channel banks are stabilized. Finally, spatial patterns in lithology, land cover, climate or topography can cause SSY to increase or decrease at any basin area and can therefore result in non-linear relations with A. Altogether, with increasing A often first a rise and then a decrease in SSY is observed. The decrease can be absent or can be postponed within a region due to local factors of which lithology, land cover, climate and topography are the most important ones. The large regional, local and even temporal variability in the trend between A and SSY implies that prediction of SSY based on A alone is troublesome and preferably spatially distributed information on land use, climate, lithology, topography and dominant erosion processes is required.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133307076485
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/16331
DOI10.1177/0309133307076485
ISSN1477-0296 (Online)
0309-1333 (Print)
Aparece en las colecciones: (CEBAS) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.