English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/162511
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

How good is your marine protected area at curbing threats?

AuthorsZupan, Mirta; Bulleri, Fabio; Evans, Julian; Fraschetti, Simonetta; Guidetti, P.; García-Rubies, Antoni ; Sostres, Marta; Asnaghi, Valentina; Caro, Anthony; Deudero Company, María de la Salud ; Goñi, Raquel; Guarnieri, Giuseppe; Guilhaumon, François; Kersting, D. K.; Kokkali, Athina; Kruschel, Claudia; Mačić, Vesna; Mangialajo, L.; Mallol, Sandra; Macpherson, Enrique ; Panucci, Antonella; Radolovic, Mirko; Ramdani, Mohamed; Schembri, Patrick J.; Terlizzi, Antonio; Villa, Elisa; Claudet, Joachim
KeywordsNon-extractive activities
Marine use
Fully protected area
Partially protected area
Management
Extractive activities
Issue Date2018
PublisherElsevier
CitationBiological Conservation 221 : 237-245 (2018)
AbstractMarine protected areas (MPAs) are key tools to mitigate human impacts in coastal environments, promoting sustainable activities to conserve biodiversity. The designation of MPAs alone may not result in the lessening of some human threats, which is highly dependent on management goals and the related specific regulations that are adopted. Here, we develop and operationalize a local threat assessment framework. We develop indices to quantify the effectiveness of MPAs (or individual zones within MPAs in the case of multiple-use MPAs) in reducing anthropogenic extractive and non-extractive threats operating at local scale, focusing specifically on threats that can be managed through MPAs. We apply this framework in 15 Mediterranean MPAs to assess their threat reduction capacity. We show that fully protected areas effectively eliminate extractive activities, whereas the intensity of artisanal and recreational fishing within partially protected areas, paradoxically, is higher than that found outside MPAs, questioning their ability at reaching conservation targets. In addition, both fully and partially protected areas attract non-extractive activities that are potential threats. Overall, only three of the 15 MPAs had lower intensities for the entire set of eight threats considered, in respect to adjacent control unprotected areas. Understanding the intensity and occurrence of human threats operating at the local scale inside and around MPAs is important for assessing MPAs effectiveness in achieving the goals they have been designed for, informing management strategies, and prioritizing specific actions.
DescriptionEste artículo contiene 9 páginas, 6 figuras, 1 tabla.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.013
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/162511
ISSN0006-3207
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.