English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/161764
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling

AuthorsChavarro, Diego; Tang, Puay; Rafols, Ismael
KeywordsResearch evaluation
Non-mainstream journals Publication patterns
Mainstream journals
Science communication system
Issue Date2017
CitationResearch Policy 46(9): 1666-1680 (2017)
AbstractIn many countries research evaluations confer high importance to mainstream journals, which are considered to publish excellent research. Accordingly, research evaluation policies discourage publications in other non-mainstream journals under the assumption that they publish low quality research. This approach has prompted a policy debate in low and middle-income countries, which face financial and linguistic barriers to access mainstream journals. A common criticism of the current evaluation practices is that they can hinder the development of certain topics that are not published in mainstream journals although some of them might be of high local relevance. In this article, we examine this issue by exploring the functions of non-mainstream journals in scientific communication. We interviewed researchers from agricultural sciences, business and management, and chemistry in Colombia on their reasons to publish in non-mainstream journals. We found that non-mainstream journals serve the following functions: 1) offer a space for initiation into publishing (training); 2) provide a link between articles in mainstream journals and articles read by communities with limited access to them (knowledge-bridging); 3) publish topics that are not well covered by mainstream journals (knowledge gap-filling). Therefore, publication in non-mainstream journals cannot be attributed only to ‘low scientific quality’ research. They also fulfil specific communication functions. These results suggest that research evaluation policy in low and middle-income countries should consider assigning greater value to non-mainstream journals given their role in bridging and disseminating potentially useful and novel knowledge.
DescriptionEl pdf corresponde con un Working Paper Series: SWPS 2016-22 (December); University of Sussex.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.002
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.002
issn: 0048-7333
e-issn: 1873-7625
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
whygapfill.pdf829,22 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.