Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

A prioritised list of invasive alien species to assist the effective implementation of EU legislation

AuthorsCarboneras, Carles; Genovesi, Piero; Vilà, Montserrat CSIC ORCID; Blackburn, Tim M.; Carrete, Martina CSIC ORCID; Clavero, Miguel CSIC ORCID; D'Hondt, Bram; Orueta, Jorge F.; Gallardo, Belinda CSIC ORCID ; Geraldes, Pedro; González-Moreno, Pablo CSIC ORCID; Greogory, Richard D.; Nentwing, Wolfgang; Paquet, Jean-Yves; Pyšek, Petr; Rabitsch, Wolfgang; Ramírez, Iván; Scalera, Riccardo; Tella, José Luis CSIC ORCID; Walton, Paul; Wynde, Robin
KeywordsAichi target 9
Alien species
EU biodiversity srtategy
EU IAS regulation
European Union
Risk assesment
Species of concern
Conservation policy
Issue Date2018
PublisherBritish Ecological Society
CitationJournal of Applied Ecology, 55: 539-547 (2018)
Abstract1. Effective prevention and control of invasive species generally relies on a comprehensive, coherent and representative list of species that enables resources to be used optimally. European Union (EU) Regulation 1143/2014 on invasive alien species (IAS) aims to control or eradicate priority species, and to manage pathways to prevent the introduction and establishment of new IAS; it applies to species considered of Union concern and subject to formal risk assessment. So far, 49 species have been listed but the criteria for selecting species for risk assessment have not been disclosed and were probably unsystematic. 2. We developed a simple method to systematically rank IAS according to their maximum potential threat to biodiversity in the EU. We identified 1,323 species as potential candidates for listing, and evaluated them against their invasion stages and reported impacts, using information from databases and scientific literature. 3. 900 species fitted the criteria for listing according to IAS Regulation. We prioritised 207 species for urgent risk assessment, 59 by 2018 and 148 by 2020, based on their potential to permanently damage native species or ecosystems; another 336 species were identified for a second phase (by 2025), to prevent or reverse their profound impacts on biodiversity; and a further 357 species for assessment by 2030. 4. Policy implications. We propose a systematic, proactive approach to selecting and prioritising IAS for risk assessment to assist European Union policy implementation. We assess an unprecedented number of species with potential to harm EU biodiversity using a simple methodology and recommend which species should be considered for risk assessment in a ranked order of priority along the timeline 2018– 2030, based on their maximum reported impact and their invasion history in Europe
Publisher version (URL)htpp://
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Carboneras_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Applied_Ecology.pdf650,87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work


checked on May 21, 2022


checked on May 24, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on May 24, 2022


checked on May 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM




WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.