Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/161187
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, Noemí-
dc.contributor.authorNova, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorGheorghe, Alina-
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Prieto, Ligia E.-
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Aurora-
dc.contributor.authorMarcos, Ascensión-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T12:58:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-22T12:58:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1186/s12986-016-0154-2-
dc.identifierissn: 1743-7075-
dc.identifier.citationNutrition and Metabolism 14(1): 2 (2017)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/161187-
dc.description.abstract[Background]: Although the effects of probiotics on the immune system have been extensively evaluated under disease states, their role in healthy situations remains unclear, since changes are hardly expected under immunological homeostasis. EFSA indicates that vaccination protocols could be used to evaluate the potential role of probiotics to improve the immune response against antigen challenges. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of Lactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711 (Lc) on the specific immunity of healthy volunteers undergoing vaccination with Hepatitis A virus (HAV). [Methods]: One hundred twenty-three healthy adults were randomised into three groups to follow a 6-week (wk) intervention and all received an intramuscular HAV vaccine 2 weeks after starting the intervention: 1) PRO1 received Lc for 2weeks (1 capsule/day; 3 × 10 CFU/capsule) and placebo capsules after vaccination; 2) PRO2 received a daily capsule of Lc (3 × 10 cfu/day) before and after the challenge; 3) Control group (C) received a daily placebo capsule before and after the vaccine. Blood samples were collected at the beginning (visit 1; V1) and after 2 (V2) and 6 weeks (V3) of the intervention. At each visit, lymphocyte subset counts and cytokine levels were analysed. Specific HAV antibodies were analysed at V1 and V3. To evaluate differences between groups, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test were used regarding lymphocyte subset counts and specific HAV antibodies production, and Friedman test of related samples and Kendall concordance coefficient for cytokines production. Chi square test was used to analyse seroconversion rates. [Results]: Specific HAV antibodies were significantly higher in PRO1 (50.54 ± 29.57) compared to C (36.23 ± 16.45) (P = 0.017) and showed an intermediate value in PRO2 (41.61 ± 15.74). Seroconversion rates were similar in the three groups (97.3, 92.3 and 97.4% in C, PRO1 and PRO2 respectively). Memory T-helper lymphocytes increased in V3 vs. V1 (P = 0.032) in PRO2. No differences were found in cytokine concentrations. [Conclusion]: Mixed results have been found regarding the usefulness of Lc supplementation to increase the antigen-specific antibody response to an immune challenge. Clinical trial registration number: EudraCT Number 2016-000183-42. Registered 19 January 2016. Retrospectively registered.-
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are grateful to Biosearch Life S.A. for their financial support to the study and the delivery of the bacteria strain assessed. Research related to this work was funded by Biosearch SA in the framework of the POSTBIO project granted by the Agency of Innovation and Development of Andalusia (IDEA).-
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge support by the CSIC Open Access Publication Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectProbiotics-
dc.subjectImmune response-
dc.subjectVaccine-
dc.subjectHealthy adults-
dc.subjectLactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711-
dc.titleEvaluation of Lactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711 strain as a coadjuvant in a vaccination process: a randomised clinical trial in healthy adults-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12986-016-0154-2-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0154-2-
dc.date.updated2018-02-22T12:58:17Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.contributor.funderCSIC - Unidad de Recursos de Información Científica para la Investigación (URICI)-
dc.contributor.funderJunta de Andalucía-
dc.relation.csic-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011011es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid28070204-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICTAN) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
CEC57511.pdf505,5 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

13
checked on 17-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on 12-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

383
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

241
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons