Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16011
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

Application of Two Organic Wastes in a Soil Polluted by Lead : Effects on the Soil Enzymatic Activities

AuthorsTejada, M.; Hernández Fernández, María Teresa; García Izquierdo, Carlos
KeywordsCCGC
Crushed cotton gin compost
PM
Poultry manure
Issue Date9-Jan-2007
PublisherAmerican Society of Agronomy
Crop Science Society of America
Soil Science Society of America
CitationJournal of Environmental Quality 36 :216-225 (2007)
AbstractThe effects of adding a crushed cotton gin compost (CCGC) and a poultry manure (PM) on the enzymatic activities of a Typic Xerofluvent soil polluted with Pb were studied in the laboratory. Three hundred grams of sieved soil (<2 mm) were mixed with PM at a rate of 10% or CCGC at a rate of 17.2%, applying to the soil the same amount of organic matter with each organic amendment. Urease, protease-BBA, ß-glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and arylsulfatase activities were measured at four different incubation times (1, 7, 15, and 45 d) in soils containing seven concentrations (100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000, and 8000 mg kg–1) of Pb, and in the same soils amended with CCGC and PM. In all treatments and incubation times, the inhibition percentage of soil enzyme activities by Pb was lower in soils amended with the PM and CCGC than in nonamended soils, and it differed with the organic amendment. In this respect, the in the 8000 mg Pb kg–1 treatment at the end of the incubation period, the protease-BBA activity inhibition percentage was lower (14.7 and 33.9% lower, respectively) in CCGC- than in PM-amended soils. Since the adsorption capacity of Pb was higher in CCGC- than the PM-amended soils, the addition of organic wastes with higher humic acid concentration is more beneficial for remediation of soils polluted with Pb
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0252RA
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/16011
DOI10.2134/jeq2006.0252RA
ISSN0047-2425
Appears in Collections:(CEBAS) Artículos

Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on May 15, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on May 19, 2022

Page view(s)

319
checked on May 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.