Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16011
Share/Export:
![]() ![]() |
|
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Title: | Application of Two Organic Wastes in a Soil Polluted by Lead : Effects on the Soil Enzymatic Activities |
Authors: | Tejada, M.; Hernández Fernández, María Teresa; García Izquierdo, Carlos | Keywords: | CCGC Crushed cotton gin compost PM Poultry manure |
Issue Date: | 9-Jan-2007 | Publisher: | American Society of Agronomy Crop Science Society of America Soil Science Society of America |
Citation: | Journal of Environmental Quality 36 :216-225 (2007) | Abstract: | The effects of adding a crushed cotton gin compost (CCGC) and a poultry manure (PM) on the enzymatic activities of a Typic Xerofluvent soil polluted with Pb were studied in the laboratory. Three hundred grams of sieved soil (<2 mm) were mixed with PM at a rate of 10% or CCGC at a rate of 17.2%, applying to the soil the same amount of organic matter with each organic amendment. Urease, protease-BBA, ß-glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and arylsulfatase activities were measured at four different incubation times (1, 7, 15, and 45 d) in soils containing seven concentrations (100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000, and 8000 mg kg–1) of Pb, and in the same soils amended with CCGC and PM. In all treatments and incubation times, the inhibition percentage of soil enzyme activities by Pb was lower in soils amended with the PM and CCGC than in nonamended soils, and it differed with the organic amendment. In this respect, the in the 8000 mg Pb kg–1 treatment at the end of the incubation period, the protease-BBA activity inhibition percentage was lower (14.7 and 33.9% lower, respectively) in CCGC- than in PM-amended soils. Since the adsorption capacity of Pb was higher in CCGC- than the PM-amended soils, the addition of organic wastes with higher humic acid concentration is more beneficial for remediation of soils polluted with Pb | Publisher version (URL): | http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0252RA | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16011 | DOI: | 10.2134/jeq2006.0252RA | ISSN: | 0047-2425 |
Appears in Collections: | (CEBAS) Artículos |
Show full item record
Review this work
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
checked on May 15, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
17
checked on May 19, 2022
Page view(s)
319
checked on May 20, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Dimensions
WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.