English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/158893
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Seismic Oceanography in the Tyrrhenian Sea: Thermohaline Staircases, Eddies, and Internal Waves

AuthorsBuffett, Grant ; Krahmann, Gerd; Klaeschen, Dirk; Schroeder, K.; Sallarès, Valentí ; Papenberg, C.; Ranero, César R. ; Zitellini, Nevio
Issue DateNov-2017
PublisherAmerican Geophysical Union
CitationJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122(11): 8503-8523 (2017)
AbstractWe use seismic oceanography to document and analyze oceanic thermohaline fine structure across the Tyrrhenian Sea. Multichannel seismic (MCS) reflection data were acquired during the MEDiterranean OCcidental survey in April–May 2010. We deployed along-track expendable bathythermograph probes simultaneous with MCS acquisition. At nearby locations we gathered conductivity-temperature-depth data. An autonomous glider survey added in situ measurements of oceanic properties. The seismic reflectivity clearly delineates thermohaline fine structure in the upper 2,000 m of the water column, indicating the interfaces between Atlantic Water/Winter Intermediate Water, Levantine Intermediate Water, and Tyrrhenian Deep Water. We observe the Northern Tyrrhenian Anticyclone, a near-surface mesoscale eddy, plus laterally and vertically extensive thermohaline staircases. Using MCS, we are able to fully image the anticyclone to a depth of 800 m and to confirm the horizontal continuity of the thermohaline staircases of more than 200 km. The staircases show the clearest step-like gradients in the center of the basin while they become more diffuse toward the periphery and bottom, where impedance gradients become too small to be detected by MCS. We quantify the internal wave field and find it to be weak in the region of the eddy and in the center of the staircases, while it is stronger near the coastlines. Our results indicate this is because of the influence of the boundary currents, which disrupt the formation of staircases by preventing diffusive convection. In the interior of the basin, the staircases are clearer and the internal wave field weaker, suggesting that other mixing processes such as double diffusion prevail
Description21 pages, 11 figures, 2 appendices, supporting information https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JC01272, data are available https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.875602
Publisher version (URL)https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012726
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/158893
Identifiersdoi: 10.1002/2017JC012726
issn: 2169-9291
e-issn: 2169-9291
Appears in Collections:(Geo3Bcn) Artículos
(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Buffett_et_al-2017.pdf1,66 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Buffett_et_al-2017_suppl_1.docx341,89 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.