English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/156637
COMPARTIR / IMPACTO:
Estadísticas
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Título

Aggregation Operators to Support Collective Reasoning

AutorRodríguez-Aguilar, Juan Antonio ; Serramia, Marc ; López-Sánchez, Maite
Palabras claveCollective decision
Virtual community
Social choice
Scarce resources
Continuous opinions
Aggregation operator
Fecha de publicación2016
EditorSpringer
CitaciónModeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2016. LNAI 9880 (2016): 3-14
ResumenModeration poses one of the main Internet challenges. Currently, many Internet platforms and virtual communities deal with it by intensive human labour, some big companies-such as YouTube or Facebook-hire people to do it, others-such as 4chan or fanscup-just ask volunteer users to get in charge of it. But in most cases the policies that they use to decide if some contents should be removed or if a user should be banned are not clear enough to users. And, in any case, typically users are not involved in their definition. Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom concluded that societies-such as institutions that had to share scarce resources-that involve individuals in the definition of their rules performed better-resources lasted more or did not deplete-than those organisations whose norms where imposed externally. Democracy also relies on this same idea of considering peoples’ opinions. In this vein, we argue that participants in a virtual community will be more prone to behave correctly-and thus the community itself will be “healthier”-if they take part in the decisions about the norms of coexistence that rule the community. With this aim, we investigate a collective decision framework that: (1) structures (relate) arguments issued by different participants; (2) allows agents to express their opinions about arguments; and (3) aggregates opinions to synthesise a collective decision. More precisely, we investigate two aggregation operators that merge discrete and continuous opinions. Finally, we analyse the social choice properties that our discrete aggregator operator satisfies. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/156637
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-45656-0_1
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45656-0_1
issn: 03029743
isbn: 978-331945655-3
Aparece en las colecciones: (IIIA) Comunicaciones congresos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
MDAI2016_LNAI9880_3-14.pdf395,57 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.