English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/156288
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Should I Change or Should I Go? Phenotypic Plasticity and Matching Habitat Choice in the Adaptation to Environmental Heterogeneity

AuthorsEdelaar, Pim ; Jovani, Roger ; Gómez-Mestre, Iván
KeywordsPhenotypic plasticity
Matching habitat choice
Environmental heterogeneity
Dispersal
Local adaptation
Individual-based simulation models
Issue Date2017
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
CitationAmerican Naturalist, 190: 506-520 (2017)
AbstractIt can be challenging for organisms to achieve a good match between their phenotypic characteristics and environmental requirements that vary in space and time. The evolution of adaptive phenotypes can result from genetic differentiation at the population level. Individuals, however, could also change their phenotype (adaptive plasticity) or select an environment because it matches with their phenotype (matching habitat choice). It is poorly known under which conditions these different solutions to environmental heterogeneity evolve and whether they operate together. Using an individual-based simulation model, we assessed which solutions evolved depending on degree of temporal variation, costs of multiple underlying traits, and order of dispersal and development. Population genetic divergence was superseded by plasticity or matching habitat choice as temporal variation increased. Plasticity and matching habitat choice were limited by their trait costs, even when this involved only a part of the underlying traits. Independent of the order of dispersal and development, plasticity evolved more commonly than matching habitat choice, in part because the match a phenotype can achieve by matching habitat choice is limited by the types of environments available. Our results explain the apparent relative rarity of matching habitat choice in nature. At the same time, our results can be used to look for matching habitat choice in those biological systems where the conditions for other solutions seem unfavorable.
Publisher version (URL)htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/693345
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/156288
DOI10.1086/693345
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
American Nat..pdf998,68 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.