English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/155641
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

A general framework for effectiveness concepts in mutualisms

AuthorsSchupp, Eugene W. ; Jordano, Pedro ; Gómez, José María
Issue Date2017
PublisherBlackwell Publishing
CitationEcology Letters 20: 577- 590 (2017)
AbstractA core interest in studies of mutualistic interactions is the ‘effectiveness’ of mutualists in providing benefits to their partners. In plant-animal mutualisms it is widely accepted that the total effect of a mutualist on its partner is estimated as (1) a ‘quantity’ component multiplied by (2) a ‘quality’ component, although the meanings of ‘effectiveness,’ ‘quantity,’ and ‘quality’ and which terms are applied to these metrics vary greatly across studies. In addition, a similar quantity × quality = total effect approach has not been applied to other types of mutualisms, although it could be informative. Lastly, when a total effect approach has been applied, it has invariably been from a phytocentric perspective, focussing on the effects of animal mutualists on their plant partner. This lack of a common framework of ‘effectiveness’ of mutualistic interactions limits generalisation and the development of a broader understanding of the ecology and evolution of mutualisms. In this paper, we propose a general framework and demonstrate its utility by applying it to both partners in five different types of mutualisms: pollination, seed dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms. We then briefly discuss the flexibility of the framework, potential limitations, and relationship to other approaches.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/155641
DOI10.1111/ele.12764
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/ele.12764
issn: 1461-0248
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Schupp_et_al-2017-Ecology_Letters.pdf1,91 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.