English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/152512
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Quantifying pruning impacts on olive tree architecture and annual canopy growth by using UAV-based 3D modelling

AuthorsJiménez-Brenes, Francisco Manuel ; López Granados, Francisca ; Castro, Ana Isabel de ; Torres-Sánchez, Jorge ; Serrano, Nicolás; Peña Barragán, José Manuel
KeywordsCrown volume
Remote sensing
Unmanned aerial vehicle
Object-based image analysis
Precision agriculture
Issue Date6-Jul-2017
PublisherBioMed Central
CitationPlant Methods 13(1): 55 (2017)
Abstract[Background] Tree pruning is a costly practice with important implications for crop harvest and nutrition, pest and disease control, soil protection and irrigation strategies. Investigations on tree pruning usually involve tedious on-ground measurements of the primary tree crown dimensions, which also might generate inconsistent results due to the irregular geometry of the trees. As an alternative to intensive field-work, this study shows a innovative procedure based on combining unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology and advanced object-based image analysis (OBIA) methodology for multi-temporal three-dimensional (3D) monitoring of hundreds of olive trees that were pruned with three different strategies (traditional, adapted and mechanical pruning). The UAV images were collected before pruning, after pruning and a year after pruning, and the impacts of each pruning treatment on the projected canopy area, tree height and crown volume of every tree were quantified and analyzed over time.
[Results] The full procedure described here automatically identified every olive tree on the orchard and computed their primary 3D dimensions on the three study dates with high accuracy in the most cases. Adapted pruning was generally the most aggressive treatment in terms of the area and volume (the trees decreased by 38.95 and 42.05% on average, respectively), followed by trees under traditional pruning (33.02 and 35.72% on average, respectively). Regarding the tree heights, mechanical pruning produced a greater decrease (12.15%), and these values were minimal for the other two treatments. The tree growth over one year was affected by the pruning severity and by the type of pruning treatment, i.e., the adapted-pruning trees experienced higher growth than the trees from the other two treatments when pruning intensity was low (<10%), similar to the traditionally pruned trees at moderate intensity (10–30%), and lower than the other trees when the pruning intensity was higher than 30% of the crown volume.
[Conclusions] Combining UAV-based images and an OBIA procedure allowed measuring tree dimensions and quantifying the impacts of three different pruning treatments on hundreds of trees with minimal field work. Tree foliage losses and annual canopy growth showed different trends as affected by the type and severity of the pruning treatments. Additionally, this technology offers valuable geo-spatial information for designing site-specific crop management strategies in the context of precision agriculture, with the consequent economic and environmental benefits.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0205-3
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/152512
DOI10.1186/s13007-017-0205-3
ISSN1746-4811
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
13007_2017_Article_205.pdf5,47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.