Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/152424
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRoncada, Paolaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFrutos, Pilares_ES
dc.contributor.authorNudda, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-06T10:39:39Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-06T10:39:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dairy Science 100( Sup. 2):166 (2017)es_ES
dc.identifier.citationADSA Annual Meeting #118 (2017)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0022-0302-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/152424-
dc.descriptionComunicación oral (invitada) presentada al: 2017 ADSA Annual Meeting #118. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Estados Unidos), 25-28 de junio de 2017.es_ES
dc.description.abstractAs the substitute of human milk in infant food, milk from cattle and smallruminants species has been studied extensively to address their nutritionalvalue. In the last 20 yr, proteomics gave a great contribution inunderstanding the proteins component, including isoforms, posttranslational modification, interaction, functional properties, to evaluatecasein fractions, whey fractions, and milk fat globule. The study ofpolymorphisms of caseins at the protein level are key characteristics to bespecifically considered in the cheese-manufacturing industry. Differentgenotypes of αS1-casein have been observed depending on species andbreeds. These types have been associated with allergic processes and mayaffect digestibility, milk and cheese properties. Higher levels of some of theessential amino acids observed in goat milk may play an important role onthe intestinal absorption. Lower size of fat globule in goat milk has beenassociated with higher digestibility. Regarding to immune variables, nodifferences in milk immunoglobulins (IgG and IgM) have been describedwhen sheep and goat milk are compared with cow’s milk. Proteomicselucidated also some differences in proteins with immune function betweencow, sheep and goat milk whey. The IgG heavy chain C region showedhigher intensity in sheep than in the other 2 species while lactoperoxidasewas higher in cow milk whey. Conversely, the polymeric immunoglobulinreceptor isoform 1 was higher in small ruminants whey milk than in bovine.Concerning fatty acid composition, concentrations of C6:0, C8:0, andC10:0, responsibles for the flavor of cheeses, are much higher in sheep andgoat’s milk and dairy products than in cows. The opposite occurs with thecontent of cis-9 C18:1, which is lower in caprine and ovine milk fat. CLA andtrans-11 C18:1 contents seem to be slightly higher in ewe’s products.Another important achievement is the study the specific composition of themilk microbiota that directly impacts on the subsequent development ofdairy products. Microorganisms can bring about the fermentation of milkthrough the production of lactate and have a variety of different impacts onthe sensory, texture, flavor and organoleptic properties of resultantproducts.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Dairy Science Associationes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectProteomicses_ES
dc.subjectImmunityes_ES
dc.subjectFatty acides_ES
dc.titleCompositional and functional differences of ewe and goat’s milk and dairy products with regard to cow’s milk and dairy productses_ES
dc.typecomunicación de congresoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.adsa.org/2017/abstracts.aspes_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794es_ES
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypecomunicación de congreso-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGM) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Roncada et al_2017_ADSA #118.pdfAbstract241,17 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

317
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

108
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.