English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/152054
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Porta, Joanes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Hernán E.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Díaz, Elenaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSindaco, Robertoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCarranza, Salvadores_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-27T07:49:12Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-27T07:49:12Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 98: 288-299 (2016)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1055-7903-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/152054-
dc.description.abstractIn this study we used the complete fauna of geckos of the Socotra Archipelago to test whether the three gecko genera co-occurring in the islands (Pristurus, Hemidactylus and Haemodracon) produced similar outcomes of morphological and climatic diversification. To test this, we produced a time-calibrated tree of 346 geckos including all 16 endemic species of the archipelago and 26 potential close-relatives in the continent. Our dating estimates revealed that most of the diversity of geckos in the archipelago was the consequence of in situ diversification. However not all genera shared similar patterns of diversification. While in Hemidactylus and Haemodracon this involved great differences in body size and low levels of climatic diversification (mostly involving sympatric distributions), an opposite pattern appeared in Pristurus in which most of the diversification involved shifts in climatic envelopes (mostly involving allopatric and parapatric distributions) but almost no size differentiation. Consistently with this, Pristurus was the only genus in which rates of size diversification in islands were substantially lower than in the continent. This illustrates how different groups can greatly differ in their patterns of intra-island diversification and highlights the importance of taxon-dependent factors at determining different patterns of diversification in the same insular context.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by CGL2012-36970 from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (co-funded by FEDER).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectReptileses_ES
dc.subjectIslandes_ES
dc.subjectDiversificationes_ES
dc.subjectClimatees_ES
dc.subjectPhenotypees_ES
dc.titlePatterns of diversification in islands: A comparative study across three gecko genera in the Socotra Archipelagoes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.007-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.007es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissiones_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
Appears in Collections:(IBE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.