English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/147743
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Comparison of measured brightness temperatures from SMOS with modelled ones from ORCHIDEE and H-TESSEL over the Iberian Peninsula

AuthorsBarella-Ortiz, Anaïs; Polcher, Jan; Rosnay, Patricia de; Piles, María ; Gelati, Emiliano
Issue DateJan-2017
PublisherEuropean Geosciences Union
CitationHydrology and Earth System Sciences 21: 357-375 (2017)
AbstractL-band radiometry is considered to be one of the most suitable techniques to estimate surface soil moisture (SSM) by means of remote sensing. Brightness temperatures are key in this process, as they are the main input in the retrieval algorithm which yields SSM estimates. The work exposed compares brightness temperatures measured by the SMOS mission to two different sets of modelled ones, over the Iberian Peninsula from 2010 to 2012. The two modelled sets were estimated using a radiative transfer model and state variables from two land-surface models: (i) ORCHIDEE and (ii) H-TESSEL. The radiative transfer model used is the CMEM. Measured and modelled brightness temperatures show a good agreement in their temporal evolution, but their spatial structures are not consistent. An empirical orthogonal function analysis of the brightness temperature's error identifies a dominant structure over the south-west of the Iberian Peninsula which evolves during the year and is maximum in autumn and winter. Hypotheses concerning forcing-induced biases and assumptions made in the radiative transfer model are analysed to explain this inconsistency, but no candidate is found to be responsible for the weak spatial correlations at the moment. Further hypotheses are proposed and will be explored in a forthcoming paper. The analysis of spatial inconsistencies between modelled and measured TBs is important, as these can affect the estimation of geophysical variables and TB assimilation in operational models, as well as result in misleading validation studies
Description19 pges, 10 figures, 6 tables
Publisher version (URL)https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-357-2017
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/147743
DOI10.5194/hess-21-357-2017
Identifiersdoi: 10.5194/hess-21-357-2017
issn: 1027-560
e-issn: 1607-7938
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Barella_Hess_2017.pdf469,88 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.