Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/144200
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields

AuthorsBordons, María CSIC ORCID ; Aparicio, Javier CSIC ; González-Albo, Borja CSIC ORCID ; Díaz-Faes, Adrián A. CSIC ORCID
KeywordsResearch Performance
Collaboration
Social Network Analysis
Co-authorship
Social capital
Poisson regression model
Issue Date1-Jan-2015
PublisherElsevier
CitationJournal of Informetrics 9 (1): 135‐144 (2015)
AbstractResearch networks play a crucial role in the production of new knowledge since collabo-ration contributes to determine the cognitive and social structure of scientific fields andhas a positive influence on research. This paper analyses the structure of co-authorshipnetworks in three different fields (Nanoscience, Pharmacology and Statistics) in Spain overa three-year period (2006–2008) and explores the relationship between the research per-formance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks. A denser co-authorshipnetwork is found in the two experimental fields than in Statistics, where the network is ofa less connected and more fragmented nature. Using the g-index as a proxy for individualresearch performance, a Poisson regression model is used to explore how performance isrelated to different co-authorship network measures and to disclose interfield differences.The number of co-authors (degree centrality) and the strength of links show a positive rela-tionship with the g-index in the three fields. Local cohesion presents a negative relationshipwith the g-index in the two experimental fields, where open networks and the diversity ofco-authors seem to be beneficial. No clear advantages from intermediary positions (highbetweenness) or from being linked to well-connected authors (high eigenvector) can beinferred from this analysis. In terms of g-index, the benefits derived by authors from theirposition in co-authorship networks are larger in the two experimental fields than in thetheoretical one.
Publisher version (URL)https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-informetrics
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/144200
DOI10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
ISSN1751-1577
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IFS) Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Bordons_et_al_october2014_post-print.pdf288,16 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

64
checked on Jan 17, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

52
checked on Jan 21, 2022

Page view(s)

404
checked on Jan 25, 2022

Download(s)

491
checked on Jan 25, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.