English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/144162
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Drawbacks of dialysis procedures for removal of EDTA

AuthorsMónico, Andreia; Martínez-Senra, Eva; Cañada, F. Javier ; Zorrilla, Silvia ; Pérez-Sala, Dolores
Issue Date18-Jan-2017
PublisherPublic Library of Science
CitationPLoS ONE 12(1): e0169843 (2017)
AbstractEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating agent commonly used in protein purification, both to eliminate contaminating divalent cations and to inhibit protease activity. For a number of subsequent applications EDTA needs to be exhaustively removed. Most purification methods rely in extensive dialysis and/or gel filtration in order to exchange or remove protein buffer components, including metal chelators. We report here that dialysis protocols,even as extensive as those typically employed for protein refolding, may not effectively remove EDTA, which is reduced only by approximately two-fold and it also persists after spin-column gel filtration, as determined by NMR and by colorimetric methods. Remarkably, the most efficient removal was achieved by ultrafiltration, after which EDTA became virtually undetectable. These results highlight a potentially widespread source of experimental variability affecting free divalent cation concentrations in protein applications.
Description9 p.-3 fig.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169843
DOI10.1371/journal. pone.0169843
Appears in Collections:(CIB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.2017.pdfArtículo principal651,79 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.