English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/143950
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Serologic tests for detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa)

AuthorsBoadella, Mariana ; Lyashchenko, Konstantin P.; Jaroso, Raquel ; Carta, Tania ; Garrido, Joseba M.; Vicente, Joaquín ; Fuente, José de la ; Gortázar, Christian
KeywordsBovine tuberculosis
Paratuberculosis
Wild boars
Swine
Specificity
Serology
Sensitivity
Issue Date2011
PublisherSage Publications
CitationJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 23(1): 77-83 (2011)
AbstractNew tools to detect exposure of free-range Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa) to pathogenic mycobacteria would be valuable for improved disease surveillance and wildlife management. Two hundred sera from wild boar of known Mycobacterium bovis infection status were used to evaluate test suitability for the detection of antibodies against M. bovis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (or crossreacting members of the M. avium complex). Two traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were evaluated using M. bovis purified protein derivative (bPPD) and paratuberculosis protoplasmatic antigen 3 (PPA3) as antigens, respectively, and a new point-of-care test format for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) that uses the innovative dual-path platform (DPP TB) test. The effect of individual factors (sex, age, lesions) on the diagnostic performance of the serologic tests was also determined. Although the DPP had a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 90.4%, for bPPD, the sensitivity was 79.2% and the specificity 100%. Both tests had a kappa agreement of 0.80. Sixty-five of 68 (95.6%) wild boar sera with antibodies against the PPA3 antigen corresponded to known M. bovis-infected wild boar. Significant differences were not observed in the bPPD and DPP readings among lesion categories or between age classes. A slight sex-related difference in sensitivity toward males in the DPP was found, but it was not detected in the bPPD enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results support the use of antibody-based diagnostic tests for both large-scale and individual bTB testing of Eurasian wild boar and suggest that wild boar cannot be used as sentinels for infections caused by M. avium complex members.
DescriptionBoadella et al.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871102300111
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/143950
DOI10.1177/104063871102300111
Identifiersissn: 1040-6387
e-issn: 1943-4936
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
suscrofa.pdf125,91 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.