Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/1435
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invite to open peer review
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHirschman, Lynette-
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorBlaschke, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorValencia, Alfonso-
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-08T15:20:54Z-
dc.date.available2007-05-08T15:20:54Z-
dc.date.issued2005-05-24-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl 1):S1-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2105-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/1435-
dc.descriptionFrom A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology-
dc.description.abstract[Background]The goal of the first BioCreAtIvE challenge (Critical Assessment of Information Extraction in Biology) was to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for text mining applied to biological problems. The results were presented in a workshop held in Granada, Spain March 28–31, 2004. The articles collected in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement entitled "A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology" describe the BioCreAtIvE tasks, systems, results and their independent evaluation.en
dc.description.abstract[Results] BioCreAtIvE focused on two tasks. The first dealt with extraction of gene or protein names from text, and their mapping into standardized gene identifiers for three model organism databases (fly, mouse, yeast). The second task addressed issues of functional annotation, requiring systems to identify specific text passages that supported Gene Ontology annotations for specific proteins, given full text articles.-
dc.description.abstract[Conclusion] The first BioCreAtIvE assessment achieved a high level of international participation (27 groups from 10 countries). The assessment provided state-of-the-art performance results for a basic task (gene name finding and normalization), where the best systems achieved a balanced 80% precision / recall or better, which potentially makes them suitable for real applications in biology. The results for the advanced task (functional annotation from free text) were significantly lower, demonstrating the current limitations of text-mining approaches where knowledge extrapolation and interpretation are required. In addition, an important contribution of BioCreAtIvE has been the creation and release of training and test data sets for both tasks. There are 22 articles in this special issue, including six that provide analyses of results or data quality for the data sets, including a novel inter-annotator consistency assessment for the test set used in task 2.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work of AV and CB was funded by the European Commission as part of the E-BioSci and ORIEL projects, contract numbers QLRI-CT-2001- 30266 and IST-2001-32688, under the RTD Programmes "Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources" and "Multimedia Content and Tools (KA3)".-
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.titleOverview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biologyen
dc.typeartículoen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S1-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid15960821-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:(CNB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1471-2105-6-S1-S1.pdf302,69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

165
checked on Apr 10, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

387
checked on Apr 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

291
checked on Feb 26, 2024

Page view(s)

436
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

260
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.