English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/142729
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Estimating home-range size: when to include a third dimension?

AuthorsMonterroso, Pedro S. ; Sillero, Neftalí; Rosalino, Luis Miguel; Loureiro, Filipa; Alves, Paulo C.
KeywordsMammalian ecology
Planimetric home-range
Slope threshold
Topographic home-range
Issue Date2013
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationEcology and Evolution 3(7): 2285-2295 (2013)
AbstractMost studies dealing with home ranges consider the study areas as if they were totally flat, working only in two dimensions, when in reality they are irregular surfaces displayed in three dimensions. By disregarding the third dimension (i.e., topography), the size of home ranges underestimates the surface actually occupied by the animal, potentially leading to misinterpretations of the animals' ecological needs. We explored the influence of considering the third dimension in the estimation of home-range size by modeling the variation between the planimetric and topographic estimates at several spatial scales. Our results revealed that planimetric approaches underestimate home-range size estimations, which range from nearly zero up to 22%. The difference between planimetric and topographic estimates of home-ranges sizes produced highly robust models using the average slope as the sole independent factor. Moreover, our models suggest that planimetric estimates in areas with an average slope of 16.3° (±0.4) or more will incur in errors ≥5%. Alternatively, the altitudinal range can be used as an indicator of the need to include topography in home-range estimates. Our results confirmed that home-range estimates could be significantly biased when topography is disregarded. We suggest that study areas where home-range studies will be performed should firstly be scoped for its altitudinal range, which can serve as an indicator for the need for posterior use of average slope values to model the surface area used and/or available for the studied animals.
Identifiersdoi: 10.1002/ece3.590
e-issn: 2045-7758
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
thirdimension.pdf860,69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.