Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/142454
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMelero, Remedioses_ES
dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Vicente, Rocíoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAbadal, Ernestes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-12T16:14:29Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-12T16:14:29Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Academic Librarianship 42: 595-603 (2016)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0099-1333-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/142454-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION. The aim of this study was to determine the awareness of open access among the academic staff of a research-oriented Spanish university, their use of the institutional repository and their satisfaction with its services. METHODS. An anonymous survey of 37 questions was sent to all professors, researchers and doctoral students of the University of Navarra. Between 5 and 25 March 2015, a total of 1989 messages were sent by email with a link to the survey. RESULTS. A total of 352 responses (17%) were received. The responses showed statistically significant differences in opinions concerning open access journals and services created on top of the repository. Although there was general agreement on the need for open access, half the respondents adopted open access practices (which included the use of the institutional repository, personal and departmental pages and academic platforms such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate). This percentage increased with the older respondents, who were also senior members of staff with tenure and positions of authority at the university. The opinion on open access journals depended on the area of research and was related to the type of academic communication and career advancement in each discipline. Specifically, the opinions of researchers were similar within social sciences and humanities, within medicine and life sciences, and within the physical sciences. The repository services most valued were correction of bibliographic data among older researchers and document scanning among social sciences and humanities researchers. The interoperability of the repository with other systems (especially the current research information system) was also considered important. CONCLUSIONS: The opinion on open access is positive, but it does not correspond to the use of the institutional repository. The decision to make publications accessible in open access depends on academic reward and on professional recognition. The services offered by the repository managers and librarians were generally perceived positively, with differences according to the age and subject area of the respondents. The awareness of those differences might help the university library and information services to provide faculty with training and products that suit to their needs and habits.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CSO2014-52830-Pes_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPostprintes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccessen_EN
dc.subjectOpen Access Policyes_ES
dc.subjectInstitutional repositoreses_ES
dc.subjectAwarenesses_ES
dc.subjectOpen access publicationses_ES
dc.titleOpen access awareness and perceptions in an institutional landscapees_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.07.002es_ES
dc.embargo.terms2016-07-01es_ES
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons BY-NC-NDes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IATA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
OPEN_ACCESS_AWARENESS-postprint.pdfArticulo conteniendo tablas y figuras361,26 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Open awareness castellano.pdfVersion en castellano599,74 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on 08-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

440
checked on 18-abr-2024

Download(s)

825
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.