Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/142355
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMoniuszko, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorAlberdi, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorBell-Sakyi, Lesley-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-11T08:07:48Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-11T08:07:48Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.01.010-
dc.identifiere-issn: 1877-9603-
dc.identifierissn: 1877-959X-
dc.identifier.citationTicks and Tick-borne Diseases 5(4): 415-422 (2014)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/142355-
dc.descriptionOpen Access funded by Wellcome Trust.-- et al.-
dc.description.abstractTicks transmit various human and animal microbial pathogens and may harbour more than one pathogen simultaneously. Both viruses and bacteria can trigger, and may subsequently suppress, vertebrate host and arthropod vector anti-microbial responses. Microbial coinfection of ticks could lead to an advantage or disadvantage for one or more of the microorganisms. In this preliminary study, cell lines derived from the ticks Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus were infected sequentially with 2 arthropod-borne pathogens, Borrelia burgdorferi s.s., Ehrlichia ruminantium, or Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and the effect of coinfection on the replication of these pathogens was measured. Prior infection of tick cell cultures with the spirochaete B. burgdorferi enhanced subsequent replication of the rickettsial pathogen E. ruminantium whereas addition of spirochaetes to cells infected with E. ruminantium had no effect on growth of the latter. Both prior and subsequent presence of B. burgdorferi also had a positive effect on SFV replication. Presence of E. ruminantium or SFV had no measurable effect on B. burgdorferi growth. In tick cells infected first with E. ruminantium and then with SFV, virus replication was significantly higher across all time points measured (24, 48, 72. h post infection), while presence of the virus had no detectable effect on bacterial growth. When cells were infected first with SFV and then with E. ruminantium, there was no effect on replication of either pathogen. The results of this preliminary study indicate that interplay does occur between different pathogens during infection of tick cells. Further study is needed to determine if this results from direct pathogen-pathogen interaction or from effects on host cell defences, and to determine if these observations also apply in vivo in ticks. If presence of one pathogen in the tick vector results in increased replication of another, this could have implications for disease transmission and incidence.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Wellcome Trust grant no. 088588 “Establishment and maintenance of a global tick cell line collection” (MPA, LB-S), and by a Roslin Institute BBSRC Strategic Programme Grant (AK, JKF, GB). AM received a Polish School of Medicine Memorial Fund Scholarship from the University of Edinburgh. CR is an Early-Stage Researcher supported by the POSTICK ITN (Post-graduate training network for capacity building to control ticks and tick-borne diseases) within the FP7-PEOPLE-ITN programme (EU Grant no. 238511).-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/238511-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectCoinfection-
dc.subjectIxodes spp.-
dc.subjectSemliki Forest virus-
dc.subjectBorrelia-
dc.subjectEhrlichia-
dc.subjectTick cell line-
dc.titleCoinfection of tick cell lines has variable effects on replication of intracellular bacterial and viral pathogens-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.01.010-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.01.010-
dc.date.updated2017-01-11T08:07:48Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK)-
dc.contributor.funderWellcome Trust-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Edinburgh-
dc.relation.csic-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000848es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid24685441-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
viral pathogens.pdf1,37 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

10
checked on 26-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on 15-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

223
checked on 14-abr-2024

Download(s)

217
checked on 14-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons