Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/142333
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Assessment of an oral Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine and an inactivated M. bovis preparation for wild boar in terms of adverse reactions, vaccine strain survival, and uptake by nontarget species

AutorBeltrán-Beck, Beatriz CSIC ORCID; Romero, Beatriz; Sevilla, Iker A.; Barasona, José A. CSIC ORCID; Garrido, Joseba M.; González-Barrio, David CSIC ORCID; Díez-Delgado, Iratxe CSIC ORCID; Minguijón, Esmeralda; Casal, Carmen; Vicente, Joaquín CSIC ORCID ; Gortázar, Christian CSIC ORCID ; Aranaz, Alicia
Fecha de publicación2014
EditorAmerican Society for Microbiology
CitaciónClinical and Vaccine Immunology 21(1): 12-20 (2014)
ResumenWildlife vaccination is increasingly being considered as an option for tuberculosis control. We combined data from laboratory trials and an ongoing field trial to assess the risk of an oral Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine and a prototype heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis preparation for Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa). We studied adverse reactions, BCG survival, BCG excretion, and bait uptake by nontarget species. No adverse reactions were observed after administration of BCG (n = 27) or inactivated M. bovis (n = 21). BCG was not found at necropsy (175 to 300 days postvaccination [n = 27]). No BCG excretion was detected in fecal samples (n = 162) or in urine or nasal, oral, or fecal swab samples at 258 days postvaccination (n = 29). In the field, we found no evidence of loss of BCG viability in baits collected after 36 h (temperature range, 11°C to 41°C). Camera trapping showed that wild boar (39%) and birds (56%) were the most frequent visitors to bait stations (selective feeders). Wild boar activity patterns were nocturnal, while diurnal activities were recorded for all bird species. We found large proportions of chewed capsules (29%) (likely ingestion of the vaccine) and lost baits (39%) (presumably consumed), and the proportion of chewed capsules showed a positive correlation with the presence of wild boar. Both results suggest proper bait consumption (68%). These results indicate that BCG vaccination in wild boar is safe and that, while bait consumption by other species is possible, this can be minimized by using selective cages and strict timing of bait deployment.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/142333
DOI10.1128/CVI.00488-13
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1128/CVI.00488-13
issn: 1556-6811
e-issn: 1556-679X
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

14
checked on 16-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on 13-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

228
checked on 18-mar-2024

Download(s)

69
checked on 18-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.