English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/141796
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Comparative study of trophic behaviour and herd structure in wild and feral goats living in a mediterranean island: Management implications

AuthorsRivera-Sánchez, Leidy; Cassinello, Jorge ; Baraza Ruíz, Elena; Bartolomé, Jordi
KeywordsMajorcan wild goat
Feeding
Behaviour
Hunting
Insularity
Feral goat
Issue Date2015
PublisherElsevier
CitationApplied Animal Behaviour Science 165: 81- 87 (2015)
AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the trophic behaviour and the social structure of Majorcan wild goats and feral goats present in the island of Majorca. The former are descendants of an ancestral goat ecotype introduced in the island in the late Neolithic, whereas feral goats come from domestic forms introduced recently from the Iberian Peninsula. The study was conducted in four localities of the Serra de Tramuntana, a mountain range located in the northwest of the island of Majorca. Behavioural data were collected in three seasons, summer, winter and spring of 2011-2013, and when goat activity is at its peak, i.e., 3. h after dawn and before dusk. The following variables were recorded: group composition (males, females, and kids) and activity (feeding, walking, resting, and watching). The proportion of time spent on each activity and their frequency were obtained from focal samples. Multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) were used to simultaneously analyse the activity variables. A total of 155 observations of 85 herds were registered throughout the study. A similar behaviour pattern has been observed in this study for the two goat ecotypes, feral and wild, apart from some seasonal variations in feeding and resting activities. In summer, feral goats showed higher feeding efforts (duration and frequency) than wild goats; this might be related to a lower efficiency obtaining feeding resources by the former, whereas wild goats, that have inhabited the island for millennia, coexisting with vegetation in periods of lower forage abundance and quality, would be more efficient herbivores during restrictive periods. Average herd size for both ecotypes is smaller than that recorded for domestic goat herds, suggesting a relatively low browsing damage compared to the latter. Also, feral goats apparently have a higher gregarious behaviour than wild ones, which might relate to their domestic origin. Currently, the management of goats on the island is based on maintaining the wild ecotype and eradicate the feral one, whose impact on vegetation is supposedly worse. However, our results show a similar trophic behaviour by both ecotypes, so that their impact on vegetation should also be expected to be similar, indicating that this argument has not enough scientific basis.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.015
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/141796
DOI10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.015
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.015
issn: 0168-1591
Appears in Collections:(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
APPLAN.pdf485,92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.