English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/14105
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Lorenzo-
dc.descriptionPonencia sobre el razonamiento y la lógica relevante. 15 paginas.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe negative approach to a theory of rationality is primarily concerned with rejecting what is irrational, which usually is equated with what is inconsistent. The positive approach tries to enhance patterns of reasoning practice. Different sorts of consistency and inconsistency are by no means equivalent. What is anyway required is positive reasoning. So, I espouse the positive view: to reason is to infer, and since inference is relative, so is reasoning. As an approximation to deductive reasoning, I sketch a system of logic close enough to the most widely publicized relevant system of entailment logic. Reasoning as thus implemented is of course somehow artificial. Some part of the remaining task can be afforded by a pragmatic rounding out of purely inferential logic.en_US
dc.format.extent67916 bytes-
dc.subjectTeoría de la racionalidaden_US
dc.subjectLógica del entrañamientoen_US
dc.subjectLógica relevanteen_US
dc.subjectTheory of rationalityen_US
dc.subjectEntailment logicen_US
dc.subjectRelevant logicen_US
dc.titleIs Reasoning the Same as Relevant Inference?en_US
dc.typeComunicación de congresoen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IFS) Comunicaciones congresos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
reasonin.pdf66,32 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Show simple item record

NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.