English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/137567
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Título

Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level

AutorCostas Comesaña, Rodrigo ; Bordons, María
Fecha de publicaciónnov-2008
EditorAkadémiai Kiadó (Budapest)
CitaciónScientometrics, 77(2): 267-288, 2008
ResumenThe ability of g-index and h-index to discriminate between different types of scientists (low producers, big producers, selective scientists and top scientists) is analysed in the area of Natural Resources at the Spanish CSIC (WoS, 1994-2004). Our results show that these indicators clearly differentiate low producers and top scientists, but do not discriminate between selective scientists and big producers. However, g-index is more sensitive than h-index in the assessment of selective scientists, since this type of scientist shows in average a higher g-index/h-index ratio and a better position in g-index rankings than in the h-index ones. Current research suggests that these indexes do not substitute each other but that they are complementary.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/137567
DOI10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IFS) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Costas__Bordons_Scientometrics_2008.pdf289,12 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.