English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/136506
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


A comparative study of cleaning methods for tarnished silver

AuthorsPalomar Sanz, Teresa ; Ramírez Barat, B.; García, Emma; Cano Díaz, Emilio
KeywordsCleaning methods
Pure silver
Sterling silver
Issue DateJan-2016
CitationJournal of Cultural Heritage 17: 20-26 (2016)
AbstractTarnishing is produced by reaction of silver with gaseous reduced sulphur compounds from atmospheric pollution. It induces the formation of AgS crystals which produce a dark appearance. To remove sulphur tarnishing, different mechanical, chemical and electrochemical methods have been traditionally used. To assess the effect of different cleaning treatments on tarnished silver, coupons of pure and sterling silver (92% Ag/8% Cu) were subjected to six cycles of induced tarnishing and cleaning. The cleaning methods evaluated were mechanical (soft abrasives and rubber point mounted on a rotary tool); chemical (chelating and acid solutions) and electrochemical (potentiostatic reductions). Surface morphology, composition, weight, color and luminosity were evaluated by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and colorimetry. The cleaning impact on tarnished silver depended on the cleaning procedure and the composition of silver. Mechanical treatments restored the original visual appearance of silver although they produced a significant mass loss and a fast re-tarnishing. Chemical cleaning methods were fast; nevertheless the surface appeared completely attacked. Electrochemical cleaning did not yield good result for sterling silver, but was an effective cleaning method for pure silver coupons.
Publisher version (URL)http://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.07.012
Identifiersissn: 1296-2074
Appears in Collections:(CENIM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Palomar_A_Comparative_2016_ Journal of Cultural Heritage.pdf996,28 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.