English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/135633
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCamacho, Carloses_ES
dc.contributor.authorCanal, Davides_ES
dc.contributor.authorPotti, Jaimees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-18T06:58:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-18T06:58:33Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Evolutionary Biology, (2016) 16:158es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/135633-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Habitat selection may have profound evolutionary consequences, but they strongly depend on the underlying preference mechanism, including genetically-determined, natal habitat and phenotype-dependent preferences. It is known that different mechanisms may operate at the same time, yet their relative contribution to population differentiation remains largely unexplored empirically mainly because of the difficulty of finding suitable study systems. Here, we investigate the role of early experience and genetic background in determining the outcome of settlement by pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) breeding in two habitat patches between which dispersal and subsequent reproductive performance is influenced by phenotype (body size). For this, we conducted a cross-fostering experiment in a two-patch system: an oakwood and a conifer plantation separated by only 1 km. Results: Experimental birds mostly returned to breed in the forest patch where they were raised, whether it was that of their genetic or their foster parents, indicating that decisions on where to settle are determined by individuals’ experience in their natal site, rather than by their genetic background. Nevertheless, nearly a third (27. 6 %) moved away from the rearing habitat and, as previously observed in unmanipulated individuals, dispersal between habitats was phenotype-dependent. Pied flycatchers breeding in the oak and the pine forests are differentiated by body size, and analyses of genetic variation at microsatellite loci now provide evidence of subtle genetic differentiation between the two populations. This suggests that phenotype-dependent dispersal may contribute to population structure despite the short distance and widespread exchange of birds between the study plots. Conclusions: Taken together, the current and previous findings that pied flycatchers do not always settle in the habitat to which they are best suited suggest that their strong tendency to return to the natal patch regardless of their body size might lead to maladaptive settlement decisions and thus constrain the potential of phenotypedependent dispersal to promote microgeographic adaptationes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectCross-fosteringes_ES
dc.subjectFicedula hypoleucaes_ES
dc.subjectLocal adaptationes_ES
dc.subjectNatal habitat preference inductiones_ES
dc.subjectMatching habitat choicees_ES
dc.subjectNonrandom dispersal,es_ES
dc.subjectPied flycatcheres_ES
dc.subjectSympatric speciationes_ES
dc.titleNatal habitat imprinting counteracts the diversifying effects of phenotypedependent dispersal in a spatially structured populationes_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12862-016-0724-y-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/0.1186/s12862-016-0724-yes_ES
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Camacho et al..pdf588,35 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.