English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/134992
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Potential Vorticity and the Quasigeostrophic and Semigeostrophic Mesoscale Vertical Velocity

AuthorsViúdez, Álvaro ; Dritschel, David G.
Issue DateApr-2004
PublisherAmerican Meteorological Society
CitationJournal of Physical Oceanography 34(4): 865-887 (2004)
AbstractResults of a variety of numerical simulations are presented and the accuracy of quasigeostrophic (QG) and semigeostrophic (SG) vertical velocity estimates of the total vertical velocity is analyzed. The authors examine the dependence of the results on the potential vorticity (PV) anomaly of the flow, its time evolution, and the amount of numerical diffusion. The SG ω equation is solved in a novel way in the original physical coordinates rather than in geostrophic coordinates. A three-dimensional numerical model is used that explicitly conserves the PV on isopycnal surfaces through a contour advective semi-Lagrangian (CASL) algorithm. The numerical simulations consist initially of one or two horizontal cylinders of anomalous PV: a shear zone that induces two or three counterflowing jets. These jets destabilize and break into cyclones or anticyclones. This is accompanied by enhanced vertical motion, which exhibits a dominantly balanced quadrupole pattern in horizontal cross sections, depending on the ellipticity of the gyres, together with weak second-order inertia-gravity waves. For flows containing only negative PV anomalies the magnitude of both the QG and SG vertical velocities are smaller than the magnitude of the total vertical velocity, while the opposite occurs for flows containing only positive PV anomalies. The reason for this behavior is that the QG ω equation misses a term proportional to the Laplacian of the horizontal velocity. A new, more accurate, ω equation is proposed to recover the vertical velocity when both experimental density and horizontal velocity data are available. The SG solution is nearly always more accurate than the QG solution, particularly for the largest vertical velocity values and when the flow has single-signed PV anomalies. For flows containing both positive and negative PV anomalies, for example, mushroomlike eddies, the QG vertical velocity is a better approximation to the total vertical velocity than the SG solution. The reason for this anomalous behavior lies in one additional assumption concerning the conservation of volume that is usually adopted to derive the SG ω equation. © 2004 American Meteorological Society
Description23 pages, 19 figures, 3 appendixes
Publisher version (URL)https://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0865:PVATQA>2.0.CO;2
Identifiersdoi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0865:PVATQA>2.0.CO;2
issn: 0022-3670
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Viudez_et_al_20041,48 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.