English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/133126
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

The challenges of quantifying the carbon stored in Arctic marine gas hydrate

AuthorsMarín-Moreno, Héctor; Giustiniani, Michela; Tinivella, Umberta; Piñero, Elena
KeywordsGas hydrate inventory
Uncertainty
Ocean warming
Arctic
Issue DateMar-2016
PublisherElsevier
CitationMarine and Petroleum Geology 71: 76-82 (2016)
AbstractThe quantification of the carbon stored in gas hydrate (GH) bearing marine sediments still remains a challenge. Despite recent efforts to develop approaches to better estimate the GH inventory globally, these estimates are still highly unconstrained due to insufficient field data and poor understanding of the mechanisms fuelling the GH stability zone (GHSZ). Here we use geophysically-derived GH saturations to constraint estimates of model-derived Arctic marine GH inventory at present. We also estimate the potential carbon released from GH dissociation under a seabed warming of 2 °C over 100 yr. We estimate an inventory ranging between 0.28 and 541 Gt of carbon, which upper bound results in average GH saturations of 0.25%. Our upper bound is mainly controlled by our imposed upwards carbon-rich fluid flow of 0.01 cm yr and it is five times greater than the most recent estimate that only considers in-situ degradation of particulate organic carbon (POC). To obtain the seismically-inferred GH saturations of 5-10% offshore west of Svalbard and in the Beaufort Sea, an upwards advection of carbon-rich fluids equivalent to 0.02-0.04 cm yr is required. This mechanism may be the most important source of carbon reaching the GHSZ in Arctic marine sediments. A 2 °C seabed temperature increase over 100 yr may reduce the GH inventory by about 88.44% (0.7 Gt C) if POC is the only source, and by about 5.4% (29.7 Gt C) if the main source of carbon is the upwards advection of carbon-rich fluids
Description7 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables
Publisher version (URL)https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.014
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/133126
DOI10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.014
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.014
issn: 0264-8172
e-issn: 1873-4073
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.